Energy‐Related Behaviors in Office Buildings: A Qualitative Study on Individual and Organisational Determinants

An analysis of individual and organisational determinants of energy-related behaviors in office buildings and the interplay between the two is presented. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with office workers from four organisations in two Dutch provinces. The results indicate that, overall, work efficiency and productivity was prioritised over energy conservation. In general, self-efficacy was the most salient individual determinant, and social norm the least discussed determinant of current office energy-related behaviors. Nevertheless, both self-efficacy and social norm elements were encountered in employees' proposed strategies to achieve future office energy-saving. Formal and informal aspects of the organisational context were found to equally affect individual determinants and their related behaviors. Facility managers' and general office workers' views differed in a few but important ways. Interorganisational comparisons showed that differences in organisational foci were linked to the relative salience of normative, gain, and hedonic motivations.

[1]  Stuart H. Mann,et al.  Attitudes and Conditions for Cooperation in a Paper Recycling Program , 1977 .

[2]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Modification of Driving Behavior in a Large Transport Organization: A Field Experiment , 1989 .

[3]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[4]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING: A FUNCTION OF CONTAINER PROXIMITY , 1994 .

[5]  D. Parker,et al.  Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm , 1995 .

[6]  S. Fineman.  Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening , 1996 .

[7]  Cjh Cees Midden,et al.  Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public : evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective , 1996 .

[8]  F. Siero,et al.  Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback , 1996 .

[9]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[10]  Sanjay Sharma.  Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[11]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[12]  C. Midden,et al.  INNOVATING ‘DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION’ THEORY: INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENTION OF UTILITY COMPANIES TO ADOPT ENERGY CONSERVATION INTERVENTIONS , 2002 .

[13]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength , 2003 .

[14]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles , 2004 .

[15]  H. Staats,et al.  Effecting Durable Change , 2004 .

[16]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value‐Belief‐Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior1 , 2005 .

[17]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[19]  Gary Blau,et al.  Enacting Ecological Sustainability in the MNC: A Test of an Adapted Value-Belief-Norm Framework , 2005 .

[20]  P. Bansal,et al.  Building the Future by Looking to the Past , 2006 .

[21]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices , 2006 .

[22]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  A strategy and protocol to increase diffusion of energy related innovations into the mainstream of housing associations , 2006 .

[23]  F. Kaiser.  A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. , 2006 .

[24]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Competing explanations for adopting energy innovations for new office buildings , 2006 .

[25]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Energy-related intervention success factors: a literature review , 2007 .

[26]  C. Vlek,et al.  The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. , 2007 .

[27]  Terry L Tudor,et al.  Linking intended behaviour and actions : A case study of healthcare waste management in the Cornwall NHS , 2007 .

[28]  Dror Etzion,et al.  Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992-Present: A Review , 2007 .

[29]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[31]  L. Steg,et al.  Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior , 2007 .

[32]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[33]  Terry L Tudor,et al.  A Novel Conceptual Framework for Examining Environmental Behavior in Large Organizations , 2008 .

[34]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  Exploring Individual‐Level Factors Related to Employee Energy‐Conservation Behaviors at Work , 2008 .

[35]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  A Review of Determinants of and Interventions for Proenvironmental Behaviors in Organizations , 2012 .