Inhibition of return is at the midpoint of simultaneous cues

When multiple cues are presented simultaneously, Klein, Christie, and Morris (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12:295–300, 2005) found a gradient of inhibition (of return, IOR), with the slowest simple manual detection responses occurring to targets in the direction of the center of gravity of the cues. Here, we explored the possibility of extending this finding to the saccade response modality, using methods of data analysis that allowed us to consider the relative contributions of the distance from the target to the center of gravity of the array of cues and the nearest element in the cue array. We discovered that the bulk of the IOR effect with multiple cues, in both the previous and present studies, can be explained by the distance between the target and the center of gravity of the cue array. The present results are consistent with the proposal advanced by Klein et al., (2005) suggesting that this IOR effect is due to population coding in the oculomotor pathways (e.g., the superior colliculus) driving the eye movement system toward the center of gravity of the cued array.

[1]  M. Symonds,et al.  A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[3]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  L. Langley,et al.  Spatial distribution of attentional inhibition is not altered in healthy aging , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[6]  R. Klein,et al.  Contribution of the Primate Superior Colliculus to Inhibition of Return , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Kennard,et al.  Distinct Cortical and Collicular Mechanisms of Inhibition of Return Revealed with S Cone Stimuli , 2004, Current Biology.

[8]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .

[10]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[11]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[12]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Components of orienting in visual space , 1983 .

[13]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Parietal Lobe Lesions Disrupt Saccadic Remapping of Inhibitory Location Tagging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Oxford handbook of eye movements , 2011 .

[16]  Matthew D. Hilchey,et al.  Examining the dissociation of retinotopic and spatiotopic inhibition of return with event-related potentials , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  D. Robinson Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[18]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Correlates of Capture of Attention and Inhibition of Return across Stages of Visual Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return in single and dual tasks: Examining saccadic, keypress, and pointing responses , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Raymond M Klein,et al.  Vector averaging of inhibition of return , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[22]  R. Klein,et al.  Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. , 1994 .

[23]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Stern Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[26]  A. J. van Opstal,et al.  Role of monkey superior colliculus in saccade averaging , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  D. Pélisson,et al.  Transfer of adaptation from visually guided saccades to averaging saccades elicited by double visual targets , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Samuel,et al.  Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  A. Sereno,et al.  Disruption of Reflexive Attention and Eye Movements in an Individual with a Collicular Lesion , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[31]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  S P Tipper,et al.  Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[35]  Jonathan Vaughan,et al.  Saccades Directed at Previously Attended Locations in Space , 1984 .

[36]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Oculomotor inhibition of return , 2011 .

[37]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[38]  P. Schiller,et al.  Interactions between visually and electrically elicited saccades before and after superior colliculus and frontal eye field ablations in the rhesus monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Representation of averaging saccades in the superior colliculus of the monkey , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[41]  J. Findlay Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[42]  J. Pratt,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Inhibition of Return , 2001, Psychological science.

[43]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[44]  R. Klein,et al.  Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes , 1993, Vision Research.

[46]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  A global effect of capture saccades , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in the Remapping and Maintenance of Visual Saliency Maps: A TMS Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  R. Klein,et al.  Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review , 2010, Vision Research.

[50]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[51]  D P Munoz,et al.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.