Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.

Load theory predicts that concurrent working memory load impairs selective attention and increases distractor interference (N. Lavie, A. Hirst, J. W. de Fockert, & E. Viding). Here, the authors present new evidence that the type of concurrent working memory load determines whether load impairs selective attention or not. Working memory load was paired with a same/different matching task that required focusing on targets while ignoring distractors. When working memory items shared the same limited-capacity processing mechanisms with targets in the matching task, distractor interference increased. However, when working memory items shared processing with distractors in the matching task, distractor interference decreased, facilitating target selection. A specialized load account is proposed to describe the dissociable effects of working memory load on selective processing depending on whether the load overlaps with targets or with distractors.

[1]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[3]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[7]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[9]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  C D Wickens,et al.  The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[15]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  Scientific Approaches to Consciousness , 1997 .

[16]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Visual Search Does Not Remain Efficient When Executive Working Memory Is Working , 2004, Psychological science.

[19]  D. Allport,et al.  On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  G. Logan Automaticity, Resources, and Memory: Theoretical Controversies and Practical Implications , 1988, Human factors.

[21]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  J. Jonides,et al.  Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[27]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  G. Logan,et al.  On the Use of a Concurrent Memory Load to Measure Attention and Automaticity , 1979 .

[29]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man , 1996, NeuroImage.

[30]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[32]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Edward Awh,et al.  Verbal and Spatial Working Memory in Humans , 1996 .

[34]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[35]  C. Eriksen,et al.  The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems , 1995 .

[36]  C. Spence,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Role of Working Memory in Tactile Selective Attention , 2022 .

[37]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[38]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  William Hirst,et al.  MEM: Memory Subsystems as Processes , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[40]  R. Shepard,et al.  Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[43]  D Kahneman,et al.  Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task , 1967, Science.

[44]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[46]  Tudor S. G. Jones,et al.  Theories of Memory , 1925 .

[47]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Lee R. BROOKSf SPATIAL AND VERBAL COMPONENTS OF THE ACT OF RECALL * , 2005 .

[50]  Roy Davis,et al.  Attention and performance in the workplace , 1999 .

[51]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. , 1998, Science.

[53]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Consciousness as meta-processing. , 1997 .

[54]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Attention in Character-Classification Tasks : Evidence for the Automaticity of Component Stages , 1978 .

[55]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[56]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[59]  G. Claxton Cognitive psychology: New directions , 1980 .

[60]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.