Cognitive Responses to Persuasion as Mediators of Opinion Change

Summary Past research on the relationship between recall of message content and the effectiveness of a persuasive communication has produced contradictory findings. The present study utilized Greenwald's “cognitive response analysis” of persuasion in an attempt to clarify this relationship. Eighty male and female undergraduates were exposed to persuasive communications and then tested for their retention of message content and cognitive response content. Opinion change, both immediately and after a one-week delay, was significantly correlated with recall of cognitive responses. There was no significant correlation between recall of message content and attitude change. These results were seen as supporting Greenwald's modified learning approach to persuasion.

[1]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  The Relation of Cognitive and Memorial Processes to Persuasion in a Simulated Jury Trial , 1974 .

[2]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  The open-mindedness of the counterattitudinal role player , 1969 .

[3]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Attitude and selective learning: where are the phenomena of yesteryear? , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[5]  C. Insko,et al.  PRIMACY VERSUS RECENCY IN PERSUASION AS A FUNCTION OF THE TIMING OF ARGUMENTS AND MEASURES. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  Kaoru Yamamoto.  EXPERIMENTAL SCORING MANUALS FOR MINNESOTA TESTS OF CREATIVE THINKING AND WRITING. , 1964 .

[7]  L. Festinger,et al.  ON RESISTANCE TO PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATIONS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  W. Mcguire,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF INDUCED OPINION CHANGE AND RETENTION OF THE INDUCING MESSAGE CONTENTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  I. Janis,et al.  An experimental study of psychological resistance to fear-arousing communications. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[10]  D. Campbell,et al.  Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Attitude Change as a Function of Response Restriction , 1953 .

[12]  J. Levine,et al.  The learning and forgetting of controversial material. , 1943 .

[13]  A. Greenwald.  6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[14]  D. Cullen.  Attitude measurement by cognitive sampling. , 1968 .

[15]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Theories of attitude change , 1967 .

[16]  S. Cook,et al.  Attitude as a determinant of learning and memory: A failure to confirm. , 1966 .

[17]  I. Janis,et al.  Persuasibility and emotional disorder. , 1959 .

[18]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[19]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .