Enhancing Creativity by Modifying What Subjects Say to Themselves1

Three conceptualizations of creativity, including a mental abilities approach, an ego-analytic levels analysis approach, and an attitudinal self-concept approach, were each translated into sets of self-statements which could be modeled and then rehearsed by a group of volunteer college students. This self-instructional training group (N = 7), relative to Gendlin’s focusing training (N = 7) and to an untreated waiting list control group (N = 7), manifested a significant increase in originality and flexibility on tests of divergent thinking, an increase in preference for complexity, a significant increase in human movement responses to an inkblot test, and concomitant changes in self-concept. As a result of the focusing training, which emphasized being aware of one’s bodily feelings, the subjects' self-reports indicated that they felt more creative, but this was not reflected in their performance. The implications of enhancing creativity by explicitly training subjects to talk to themselves was discussed.

[1]  L. H. Levy,et al.  Originality as role-defined behavior. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  E. Kris,et al.  Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art , 1952 .

[3]  F. Barron,et al.  Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Donald Meichenbaum,et al.  The clinical potential of modifying what clients say to themselves. , 1974 .

[5]  E. Fromm,et al.  Hypnosis: research developments and perspectives , 1972 .

[6]  F. Barron Threshold for the perception of human movement in inkblots. , 1955, Journal of consulting psychology.

[7]  Eugene A. Brunelle,et al.  The Literature of Creativity (Part I) , 1967 .

[8]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[9]  Abraham H. Maslow,et al.  Creativity in self-actualizing people. , 1962 .

[10]  S. Freud Formulations Regarding the Two Principles in Mental Functioning , 1951 .

[11]  L. Shulman,et al.  Modes of thinking in young children , 1965 .

[12]  D. Garwood PERSONALITY FACTORS RELATED TO CREATIVITY IN YOUNG SCIENTISTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  P. Bowers Effect of hypnosis and suggestions of reduced defensiveness on creativity test performance. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[14]  S. Cashdan,et al.  Personality correlates of creative potential in talented high school students. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[15]  Donald W. MacKinnon,et al.  Creativity and images of the self. , 1963 .

[16]  C. Rogers Toward a theory of creativity. , 1954 .

[17]  G. Domino,et al.  Identification of potentially creative persons from the Adjective Check List. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  F. Barron,et al.  Artistic Perception as a Possible Factor in Personality Style: Its Measurement By a Figure Preference Test , 1952 .

[19]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Guiding creative talent , 1962 .

[20]  Harold H. Anderson,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[21]  H. Helson,et al.  Contemporary approaches to psychology , 1967 .

[22]  Effects of prior serial learning of solution words upon anagram problem solving. II. A serial position effect. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  R. White The Study of Lives , 2022 .

[24]  E. L. Gaier,et al.  Identification of creativity: the individual. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  M. Goldfried,et al.  Problem solving and behavior modification. , 1971, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  M. Wallach,et al.  The Talented Student: A Validation of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction , 1969 .

[27]  R. Taft,et al.  Creative attitudes and creative productivity: a comparison of two aspects of creativity among students. , 1970, Journal of educational psychology.

[28]  W. Holtzman,et al.  Inkblot Perception and Personality , 1962 .