Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the influence of background enhancement on the detection and staging of breast cancer using MRI as an adjunct to mammography or ultrasound.MethodsOne hundred forty-six bilateral breast MRI examinations were evaluated to assess the extent of a known primary tumour and to problem solve after mammography or ultrasound without adjusting for the phase in the patients’ menstrual cycle. The background enhancement was classified into four categories by visual evaluation: minimal, mild, moderate and marked.ResultsIn total, 131 histologically confirmed abnormal cases (104 malignant and 27 benign) and 15 normal cases were included in the analysis. There was no tumour size-related bias between the groups (p = 0.522). For the primary index tumour, the sensitivities of MRI with minimal/mild and moderate/marked background enhancement were 100% and 76% (p = 0.001), respectively. Thus, the degree of background enhancement did not affect the specificity. For evaluating tumour extent (n = 104), the accuracy of MRI with moderate/marked background enhancement (52%) was significantly lower than that with minimal/mild background enhancement (84%; p = 0.002).ConclusionThe degree of background enhancement affected the detection and staging of breast cancer using MRI.

[1]  C. Boetes,et al.  False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors , 1997, European Radiology.

[2]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  C. Claussen,et al.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  Thomas Beier,et al.  Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. , 2002, Radiology.

[5]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[6]  C. Kuhl.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  E. Morris.  Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  Andrew J Evans,et al.  Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  D. Vanel.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[10]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Les Irwig,et al.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  B. Narin,et al.  Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography , 2010, La radiologia medica.

[13]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesions. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  T. Stephens.  Background enhancement in breast MR: Correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound , 2012 .