Asymmetric interlimb transfer of concurrent adaptation to opposing dynamic forces

Interlimb transfer of a novel dynamic force has been well documented. It has also been shown that unimanual adaptation to opposing novel environments is possible if they are associated with different workspaces. The main aim of this study was to test if adaptation to opposing velocity dependent viscous forces with one arm could improve the initial performance of the other arm. The study also examined whether this interlimb transfer occurred across an extrinsic, spatial, coordinative system or an intrinsic, joint based, coordinative system. Subjects initially adapted to opposing viscous forces separated by target location. Our measure of performance was the correlation between the speed profiles of each movement within a force condition and an ‘average’ trajectory within null force conditions. Adaptation to the opposing forces was seen during initial acquisition with a significantly improved coefficient in epoch eight compared to epoch one. We then tested interlimb transfer from the dominant to non-dominant arm (D → ND) and vice-versa (ND → D) across either an extrinsic or intrinsic coordinative system. Interlimb transfer was only seen from the dominant to the non-dominant limb across an intrinsic coordinative system. These results support previous studies involving adaptation to a single dynamic force but also indicate that interlimb transfer of multiple opposing states is possible. This suggests that the information available at the level of representation allowing interlimb transfer can be more intricate than a general movement goal or a single perceived directional error.

[1]  R. Fisher FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATION , 1915 .

[2]  R. Fisher 014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .

[3]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Kawato,et al.  Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields , 2003, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Ostry,et al.  Is Interlimb Transfer of Force-Field Adaptation a Cognitive Response to the Sudden Introduction of Load? , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Learning and Transfer of an Ipsilateral Coordination Task: Evidence for a Dual-layer Movement Representation , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Actions and Consequences in Bimanual Interaction Are Represented in Different Coordinate Systems , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.