Evaluation of a multimodal resin for selective capture of CHO-derived monoclonal antibodies directly from harvested cell culture fluid.

This proof-of-concept study examines the applicability of using multimodal chromatography to selectively capture recombinantly produced monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directly from harvested mammalian cell culture fluid (HCCF) with minimal optimization. Capto MMC is a multimodal resin that contains a ligand with the potential to participate in ionic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen boding interactions with proteins and is coupled to a highly cross-linked agarose bead matrix. Twelve mAb HCCF feedstocks were examined for dynamic binding capacity (DBC) and then two representative feedstocks were selected to develop a systematic approach for elution buffer development. A range of dynamic binding capacities was observed for 10 feedstocks (24-53g/L) and two feedstocks had poor binding properties (<10g/L) despite load conditioning towards a more favorable pH. Analysis of the DBC versus molecular properties showed that the mAb-ligand binding interaction was predominantly charge based. Four separate elution strategies were identified to selectively recover the mAb and could be applied with minimal optimization to other mAb feedstocks. Downstream processing of the Capto MMC pools showed that it is feasible to produce material with comparable purity to a process with affinity capture after two chromatography steps.

[1]  John Hickey,et al.  Profiling of host cell proteins by two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D‐DIGE): Implications for downstream process development , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  J. V. Van Alstine,et al.  Ion exchange chromatography of antibody fragments , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  E. Read,et al.  Monoclonal antibody capture and viral clearance by cation exchange chromatography , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Sanchayita Ghose,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of alternatives to Protein A chromatography Mimetic and hydrophobic charge induction chromatographic stationary phases. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Kimberly A Kaleas,et al.  Industrial case study: evaluation of a mixed-mode resin for selective capture of a human growth factor recombinantly expressed in E. coli. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  K. Champion,et al.  A two‐dimensional protein map of Chinese hamster ovary cells , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[7]  Christian Frech,et al.  Cation-exchange chromatography of monoclonal antibodies: Characterisation of a novel stationary phase designed for production-scale purification , 2010, mAbs.

[8]  E. Boschetti,et al.  Comparison of hydrophobic charge induction chromatography with affinity chromatography on protein A for harvest and purification of antibodies. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  Ron D. Appel,et al.  ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Stephen H. White,et al.  Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  Pierre Girot,et al.  2-Mercapto-5-benzimidazolesulfonic acid: an effective multimodal ligand for the separation of antibodies. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[12]  Pete Gagnon,et al.  IgG aggregate removal by charged-hydrophobic mixed mode chromatography. , 2009, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[13]  J. V. Van Alstine,et al.  An exclusion mechanism in ion exchange chromatography. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  André Kiesewetter,et al.  Cation exchange chromatography in antibody purification: pH screening for optimised binding and HCP removal. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[15]  G. Malmquist,et al.  Surface extenders and an optimal pore size promote high dynamic binding capacities of antibodies on cation exchange resins. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  Deborah K Follman,et al.  Factorial screening of antibody purification processes using three chromatography steps without protein A. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  D. Harding,et al.  Hydrophobic charge induction chromatography: salt independent protein adsorption and facile elution with aqueous buffers. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  Daisuke Ejima,et al.  MEP chromatography of antibody and Fc-fusion protein using aqueous arginine solution. , 2009, Protein expression and purification.

[19]  Duncan Low,et al.  Future of antibody purification. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[20]  C. F. van der Walle,et al.  Therapeutic antibodies: market considerations, disease targets and bioprocessing. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[21]  C. Cabanne,et al.  Efficient purification of recombinant proteins fused to maltose-binding protein by mixed-mode chromatography. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  R. Ladner,et al.  Evaluation of protein engineering and process optimization approaches to enhance antibody drug manufacturability , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  M Vanderlaan,et al.  Industrial Purification of Pharmaceutical Antibodies: Development, Operation, and Validation of Chromatography Processes , 2001, Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews.

[24]  Jie Chen,et al.  The distinctive separation attributes of mixed-mode resins and their application in monoclonal antibody downstream purification process. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  Brian Hubbard,et al.  Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies--application of platform approaches. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[26]  Fred Jacobson,et al.  Protein aggregation and bioprocessing , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[27]  René Gantier,et al.  Designing new monoclonal antibody purification processes using mixed-mode chromatography sorbents. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.