POST DURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE IN CAESAREAN SECTION-A COMPARATIVE STUDY USING 25 G QUINCKE , 27 G QUINCKE AND 27 G WHITACRE NEEDLE

August Bier (1898) introduced spinal analgesia in clinical practice. Since then, the technique has been widely practiced to provide anaesthesia, particularly for surgery below umbilicus. The main advantage attributed to this technique are its simplicity, its ease of performance, requirement of minimum apparatus, has minimal effect on blood biochemistry, ensures optimum level of arterial blood gases, patients remains conscious during surgery and maintains airway, requires minimal post operative care and post operative analgesia. Since the introduction of spinal analgesia, headache has remained a well-recognized complication. The incidence of PDPH does not occur in all patients who received lumbar puncture for diagnostic or anaesthetic reasons and is found to be more common after Caesarean section in young parturients.1,2 A few decades ago less refined and thicker spinal needles were being used and the incidence of PDPH was high.2,3,4 But within the last 15 years more refined and thinner needles of 24 G to 28 G have been used more often and the incidence of PDPH is grossly reduced to less than 3 to 5%.5,6,7 The present study was designed to compare the incidence of post lumbar puncture headache after 25 G Quincke and 27 G Qunicke needle and 27 G Whitacre needle during spinal anaesthesia in cases of Caesarean section.

[1]  G. Hempelmann,et al.  [The effect of needle type and immobilization on postspinal headache]. , 1997, Der Anaesthesist.

[2]  I. Krings-Ernst,et al.  Use of a 25-gauge Whitacre needle to reduce the incidence of postdural puncture headache. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  J. Møller,et al.  Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias. , 1990 .

[4]  E. Christensen,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  E. Kiff Out-Patient Surgery , 1989 .

[6]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Postspinal headache in young and elderly patients , 1989, Anaesthesia.

[7]  F. Renkl,et al.  Spinal anesthesia with extremely fine needles. , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[8]  N. Hollis,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section , 1987, Anaesthesia.

[9]  L. Kaukinen,et al.  The prevention of headache following spinal anaesthesia. , 1981, Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae.

[10]  D. Stratmann,et al.  [Postspinal headache -- a clinical problem (author's transl)]. , 1979, Der Anaesthesist.

[11]  R. J. Jones The Role of Recumbency in the Prevention and Treatment of Postspinal Headache , 1974, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  B. E. Cappe PREVENTION OF POSTSPINAL HEADACHE WITH A 22‐GAUGE PENCIL‐POINT NEEDLE AND ADEQUATE HYDRATION , 1960, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  R. Dripps,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics; syndrome of decreased intracranial pressure (headache and ocular and auditory difficulties). , 1956, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[14]  V. Stoelting,et al.  ETIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF POSTSPINAL HEADACHES , 1951, Current researches in anesthesia & analgesia.