The effectiveness of expert support technology for decision making: individuals versus small groups

Expert support systems (ESSs) are increasingly used in organizations to support individuals and groups in decision making. Although ESSs have been shown to enhance the decision-making capabilities of individuals, their benefits in supporting group decision making are less clear. To the best of our knowledge, no empirical research has evaluated the effectiveness of the technology in the group setting or compared its usefulness for supporting individual versus group decision making. The results of this research show that ESSs benefit decision making of both individuals and groups and novices are able to gain more from ESSs than experts. The findings also suggest that groups outperform individuals in both with and without ESS support settings.

[1]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[2]  Fui Hoon Fiona Nah,et al.  An experimental study of the effects of the use of an expert support system and its explanation facilities on group decision making , 1997 .

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use and Effects of Knowledge-Based System Explanations: Theoretical Foundations and a Framework for Empirical Evaluation , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Shirley Diane. Gregor,et al.  Explanations from knowledge-based systems for human learning and problem solving , 1996 .

[5]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  An evaluation of an innovative information technology - the case of Carrier EXPERT , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[6]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  The Impact of Explanation Facilities in User Acceptance of Expert System Advice , 1995, MIS Q..

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental study of the use and effects of hypertext-based explanations in knowledge-based systems , 1995 .

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Effect ofExpert Decision Analyses and Explanations Support onConsensus and Decision Accuracy in Small Groups , 1995 .

[9]  David John Hickson,et al.  Managerial decision making , 1995 .

[10]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  Improving quality, speed and confidence in decision-making: Measuring expert systems benefits , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[11]  J. Dhaliwal.  An experimental investigation of the use of explanations provided by knowledge-based systems , 1993 .

[12]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The case for integrative innovation: an expert system at Digital , 1993 .

[13]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Use of a knowledge based systems approach in the improvement of the management of tree fodder resources on farmland in the Eastern Hills of Nepal: a pilot phase , 1993 .

[14]  Ko-Cheng Hsu,et al.  The effects of cognitive styles and interface designs on expert systems usage : an assessment of knowledge transfer , 1993 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment , 1993 .

[16]  S. Kay.  On the Nature of Expertise. , 1992 .

[17]  Jean Bédard,et al.  Expertise and Its Relation to Audit Decision Quality , 1991 .

[18]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[19]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Intelligent Interface Design: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Presentation in Expert Systems , 1990, MIS Q..

[20]  John J. Sviokla.  An examination of the impact of expert systems on the firm: the case of XCON , 1990 .

[21]  John J. Sviokla.  Expert Systems and Their Impact on the Firm: The Effects of Plan Power Use on the Information Processing Capacity of the Financial Collaborative , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  M. Doherty,et al.  Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. , 1989 .

[23]  Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al.  The rise of the expert company , 1988 .

[24]  Tim O. Peterson.  The acquisition of managerial performance feedback skills through the use of a knowledge-based expert system : an empirical evaluation , 1988 .

[25]  James Shanteau,et al.  Expert Judgment: Is More Information Better? , 1987 .

[26]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Expert systems: the next challenge for managers , 1986 .

[27]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Planpower, Xcon, and Mudman: an in-depth analysis into three commercial expert systems in use , 1986 .

[28]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Managing Group Creativity: A Modular Approach to Problem Solving , 1984 .

[29]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Programming Problem Representation in Novice and Expert Programmers , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[30]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[31]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Skill and Working Memory , 1982 .

[32]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[33]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. 3rd ed. , 1981 .

[34]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[35]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[36]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[37]  N. Maier.  Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: the need for an integrative function. , 1967, Psychological review.

[38]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[40]  A. Osborn.  Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[41]  R. W. Husband.  Cooperative versus Solitary Problem Solution , 1940 .