The visual perception of size and distance.

Abstract The perception of absolute distance has been assumed to be important in the perception of the size of objects and the depth between them. A different hypothesis is proposed. It is asserted that perceived relative size and distance are the primary psychological phenomena with perceived absolute distance derived from the perceptual summing of perceived relative depths. In agreement with this point-of-view, it is stressed that relative rather than absolute retinal extents are the determiners of visually p'erceived extents. A principle called the “adjacency principle” is identified as perceptually organizing the relative retinal stimuli. This principle states that the apparent size or position of any object in the field of view is determined by whatever size or distance cues occur between it and adjacent objects. Some evidence for the adjacency principle is discussed and some consequences of the principle are considered.

[1]  K. N. Ogle.  Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The retinal size of a familiar object as a determiner of apparent distance. , 1957 .

[3]  Koch Sigmund Ed,et al.  Psychology: A Study of A Science , 1962 .

[4]  I. Rock,et al.  The relational determination of perceived size. , 1959, Psychological review.

[5]  The Perception of Shape from Binocular Disparity Cues , 1960 .

[6]  W. Epstein.  The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The Effect of Convergence on Perceived Size and Distance , 1962 .

[8]  H. W. Hofstetter.  The relationship of proximal convergence to fusional and accommodative convergence. , 1951, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Paul Boeder,et al.  THE GEOMETRY OF BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION , 1954 .

[10]  J. Gibson.  Perception as a function of stimulation , 1959 .

[11]  T SHIPLEY,et al.  Convergence function in binocular visual space. I. A note on theory. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  H. W. Hofstetter.  Accommodation, Convergence, and Their Relation to Apparent Distance: A Criticism , 1950 .

[13]  Blank Aa,et al.  A geometry of vision. , 1957 .

[14]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Relative visual direction as a factor in relative distance perceptions. , 1956 .

[15]  Paul M. Laporte,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision , 1950 .

[16]  V. R. Carlson.  Underestimation in Size-Constancy Judgments , 1960 .

[17]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The Perception of a Depth Interval with Binocular Disparity Cues , 1960 .

[18]  H W Hofstetter.  THE PROXIMAL FACTOR IN ACCOMMODATION AND CONVERGENCE , 1942 .

[19]  Chalmers El.  Monocular and binocular cues in the perception of size and distance. , 1952 .

[20]  W. Gogel,et al.  Perception of the relative distance position of objects as a function of other objects in the field. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Rudolf K. Luneburg,et al.  Metric of binocular visual space , 1950 .

[22]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Convergence as a Determiner of Perceived Absolute Size , 1962 .

[23]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Familiar size and the perception of depth. , 1952 .

[24]  W. H. Ittelson.  A Note on “Familiar Size and the Perception of Depth” , 1953 .

[25]  E. L. Chalmers.  Monocular and binocular cues in the perception of size and distance. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  Accommodation, Convergence, and Their Relation to Apparent Distance , 1950 .

[27]  A. Ames.  Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .

[28]  G. Fry.  Visual perception of space. , 1950, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[29]  Ray Hyman,et al.  Attitude and Distance-Estimation as Variables in Size-Matching , 1959 .

[30]  W. Gogel,et al.  THE TENDENCY TO SEE OBJECTS AS EQUIDISTANT AND ITS INVERSE RELATION TO LATERAL SEPARATION , 1956 .

[31]  W. H. Ittelson.  Size as a cue to distance: static localization. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[33]  J E HOCHBERG,et al.  Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[34]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.

[35]  H WALLACH,et al.  On size-perception in the absence of cues for distance. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  H SCHLOSBERG,et al.  A note on depth perception, size constancy, and related topics. , 1950, Psychological review.

[37]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[39]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Familiar Size and Subception in Perceived Depth , 1953 .

[40]  A. Blank.  An account of recent investigations relating to the Luneburg theory of binocular space perception. , 1953, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  The Effect of Oculomotor Adjustments on Apparent Size , 1959 .

[42]  E. E. Rump.  The relationship between perceived size and perceived distance. , 1961, British journal of psychology.

[43]  Hofstetter Hw.  The relationship of proximal convergence to fusional and accommodative convergence. , 1951 .

[44]  Meredith W. Morgan,et al.  THE CLINICAL ASPECTS OF ACCOMMODATION AND CONVERGENCE , 1944 .

[45]  G S HARKER,et al.  The effectiveness of size cues to relative distance as a function of lateral visual separation. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Walter C. Gogel.  Perceived Frontal Size as a Determiner of Perceived Binocular Depth , 1960 .

[47]  Meredith W. Morgan,et al.  ACCOMMODATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CONVERGENCE , 1944 .

[48]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to absolute distance. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[49]  H. Gruber.  The relation of perceived size to perceived distance. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[50]  T. G. Hermans,et al.  The relationship of convergence and elevation changes to judgments of size. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  C. Osgood.  Method and theory in experimental psychology , 1953 .

[52]  K. Inaba,et al.  A MODIFICATION OF A STEREOPSIS ADJUSTMENT BY THE EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY , 1954 .

[53]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .