Two-view information fusion for improvement of computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast masses on mammograms

We are developing a two-view information fusion method to improve the performance of our CAD system for mass detection. Mass candidates on each mammogram were first detected with our single-view CAD system. Potential object pairs on the two-view mammograms were then identified by using the distance between the object and the nipple. Morphological features, Hessian feature, correlation coefficients between the two paired objects and texture features were used as input to train a similarity classifier that estimated a similarity scores for each pair. Finally, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier was used to fuse the score from the single-view CAD system and the similarity score. A data set of 475 patients containing 972 mammograms with 475 biopsy-proven masses was used to train and test the CAD system. All cases contained the CC view and the MLO or LM view. We randomly divided the data set into two independent sets of 243 cases and 232 cases. The training and testing were performed using the 2-fold cross validation method. The detection performance of the CAD system was assessed by free response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis. The average test FROC curve was obtained from averaging the FP rates at the same sensitivity along the two corresponding test FROC curves from the 2-fold cross validation. At the case-based sensitivities of 90%, 85% and 80% on the test set, the single-view CAD system achieved an FP rate of 2.0, 1.5, and 1.2 FPs/image, respectively. With the two-view fusion system, the FP rates were reduced to 1.7, 1.3, and 1.0 FPs/image, respectively, at the corresponding sensitivities. The improvement was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) by the AFROC method. Our results indicate that the two-view fusion scheme can improve the performance of mass detection on mammograms.

[1]  Wei Qian,et al.  Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: Influence of wavelet analysis , 1999 .

[2]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[3]  H P Chan,et al.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification. , 1996, Medical physics.

[4]  H J Collette,et al.  Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M. Wallis,et al.  A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[6]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[8]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  Edwin Silverberg,et al.  Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project , 1987, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[12]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[14]  C. Smart,et al.  Survival advantage differences by age: Evaluation of the extended follow‐up of the breast cancer detection demonstration project , 1994, Cancer.

[15]  D P Chakraborty,et al.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data. , 1989, Medical physics.

[16]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms. , 2005, Medical physics.

[17]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  W F Bischof,et al.  Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. , 1992, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  L W Bassett,et al.  Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. , 1987, Radiology.

[21]  David Gur,et al.  Performance change of mammographic CAD schemes optimized with most-recent and prior image databases. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[22]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. , 2004, Medical physics.