The experimental study of fly ash decarbonization on a circulating fluidized bed combustor

Abstract Fly ash is a by-product of coal-fired power plants, whose production is huge. As the coal resources are in short supply in recent years, most circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers in China burn hard coals, thus, the carbon content in the fly ash is much higher than expected. The high carbon content in the fly ash limits the potential utilization as building materials. At present, the decarbonization method of high carbon content CFB fly ash is mainly fly ash recirculation combustion (FARC). Because of the huge difference between original boiler operating conditions and fly ash ideal combustion state, the decarbonization effect is disappointed. Therefore, a series of fly ash decarbonization experiments were carried out on a bench-scale CFB combustor designed on fluidization properties of fly ash, and the decarbonization characteristics were discussed. Results show that fly ash requires a minimum sectional thermal load of 0.42 MW/m 2 for continuous and stable combustion in test combustor, corresponding to the critical carbon content in the fly ash is 18%. The maximum decarbonization efficiency of the test CFB combustor is approximately 75%, which is much higher than that of FARC.

[1]  Xiaoping Chen,et al.  Fly ash recirculation by bottom feeding on a circulating fluidized bed boiler co-burning coal sludge and coal , 2012 .

[2]  Robert H. Hurt,et al.  Residual carbon from pulverized coal fired boilers: 1. Size distribution and combustion reactivity , 1995 .

[3]  Guangxi Yue,et al.  Latest Development of CFB Boilers in China , 2009 .

[4]  Sun Xian-bin,et al.  Research and Development of Large CFB boilers in China , 2007 .

[5]  M. Ahmaruzzaman,et al.  A review on the utilization of fly ash , 2010 .

[6]  D. Geldart Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[7]  Yang Hairui,et al.  Semi-empirical technique for predicting ash size distribution in CFB boilers , 2004 .

[8]  Xiaofeng Lu,et al.  Effect of the bottom-contracted and edge-sloped vent-pipe on the cyclone separator performance , 2007 .

[9]  J. Alvarez-Quintana,et al.  High temperature thermal barrier coatings from recycled fly ash cenospheres , 2012 .

[10]  Joachim Werther,et al.  Catalyst attrition in cyclones , 2000 .

[11]  Jiang Lian-qun Fly Ash Recirculation Combustion System in CFB Boiler Burning Anthracite Application , 2011 .

[12]  Zhao Xin-m The Influence of Pressure Drop in CFB on Carbon Content in Fly Ash , 2005 .

[13]  Yaxin Su,et al.  Experimental study on the gas-solid suspension flow in a square cyclone separator , 2006 .

[14]  Jianbo Li,et al.  Development on a small scale industrial CFB boiler with an evaporating loop seal , 2012 .

[15]  Qing Liu,et al.  A Study of the Reactivity and Formation of the Unburnt Carbon in CFB Fly Ashes , 2008 .

[16]  Junfu Lu,et al.  Research on Carbon Content in Fly Ash from Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers , 2005 .

[17]  B. M. Gibbs,et al.  The influence of calcined limestone on NOx and N2O emissions from char combustion in fluidized bed combustors , 2001 .

[18]  Simin Li,et al.  Desulfurization Characteristics of Fly Ash Recirculation and Combustion in the Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler , 2009 .

[19]  Arto Hotta,et al.  Foster Wheeler’s Solutions for Large Scale CFB Boiler Technology: Features and Operational Performance of Łagisza 460 MWe CFB Boiler , 2009 .

[20]  D. Geldart,et al.  Fluidization of powders showing degrees of cohesiveness—I. Bed expansion , 1984 .