Deriving site-specific clean-up criteria to protect ecological receptors (plants and soil invertebrates) exposed to metal or metalloid soil contaminants via the direct contact exposure pathway

Soil contaminant concentration limits for the protection of terrestrial plants and soil invertebrates are commonly based on thresholds derived using data from laboratory ecotoxicity tests. A comprehensive assessment has been made for the derivation of ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSL) in the United States; however, these limits are conservative because of their focus on high bioavailability scenarios. Here, we explain and evaluate approaches to soil limit derivation taken by 4 jurisdictions, 2 of which allow for correction of data for factors affecting bioavailability among soils, and between spiked and field-contaminated soils (Registration Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals [REACH] Regulation, European Union [EU], and the National Environment Protection Council [NEPC], Australia). Scientifically advanced features from these methods have been integrated into a newly developed method for deriving soil clean-up values (SCVs) within the context of site-specific baseline ecological risk assessment. Resulting site-specific SCVs that account for bioavailability may permit a greater residual concentration in soil when compared to generic screening limit concentrations (e.g., Eco-SSL), while still affording acceptable protection. Two choices for selecting the level of protection are compared (i.e., allowing higher effect levels per species, or allowing a higher percentile of species that are potentially unprotected). Implementation of this new method is presented for the jurisdiction of the United States, with a focus on metal and metalloid contaminants; however, the new method can be used in any jurisdiction. A case study for molybdate shows the large effect of bioavailability corrections and smaller effects of protection level choices when deriving SCVs. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2014;10:346–357.

[1]  M. Hoop,et al.  Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for metals and metalloids in the Netherlands, taking into account background concentrations. , 2000 .

[2]  S. McGrath,et al.  Predicting molybdenum toxicity to higher plants: influence of soil properties. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[3]  Jeffrey G. White,et al.  Soil Zinc Map of the USA using Geostatistics and Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[4]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[5]  J. Römbke,et al.  Improvement of the applicability of ecotoxicological tests with earthworms, springtails, and plants for the assessment of metals in natural soils , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  C. P. Rooney,et al.  Soil factors controlling the expression of copper toxicity to plants in a wide range of European soils , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  Furthering the derivation of predictive wildlife toxicity reference values for use in soil cleanup decisions , 2014, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[8]  J. Buekers,et al.  Effect of long-term equilibration on the toxicity of molybdenum to soil organisms. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[9]  Rufus L. Chaney,et al.  Cadmium, Lead, Zinc, Copper, and Nickel in Agricultural Soils of the United States of America , 1993 .

[10]  J. Struijś,et al.  Added risk approach to derive maximum permissible concentrations for heavy metals: how to take natural background levels into account. , 1997, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[11]  T. Crommentuijn,et al.  Evaluation of the dutch environmental risk limits for metals by application of the added risk approach , 2000 .

[12]  H. T. Shacklette,et al.  Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States , 1984 .

[13]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Terrestrial biotic ligand model. 2. Application to Ni and Cu toxicities to plants, invertebrates, and microbes in soil. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Toxicity of Trace Metals in Soil as Affected by Soil Type and Aging After Contamination: Using Calibrated Bioavailability Models to Set Ecological Soil Standards , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  Traas Tp,et al.  Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits , 2001 .

[16]  Quanxi Shao,et al.  Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC toxicity data: an alternative approach , 2000 .

[17]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[18]  W Slob,et al.  Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. , 1993, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[19]  Jörg Römbke,et al.  Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: Rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes , 2014, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[20]  C. A. V. van Gestel,et al.  The influence of soil properties on the toxicity of molybdenum to three species of soil invertebrates. , 2011, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[21]  W. T. Pecora,et al.  Elemental composition of surficial materials in the conterminous United States , 1971 .