Task requirements change signal strength of the primary somatosensory M50: Oddball vs. one-back tasks.

Studies on attention to tactile stimuli have produced conflicting results concerning the possibility and/or direction of modulation of early somatosensory-evoked fields (SEFs). To evaluate sources of these conflicting results, the same subjects performed four different tasks in which the stimulation site, type, and intensity were kept constant. Twelve subjects performed an oddball-like tactile task, two different one-back tactile tasks, and a visual task, while two distal phalanges of the index and ring finger were stimulated. Task-dependent SEF modulations were found as early as 50 ms after stimulus onset (M50 component). Target/non-target ratios of M50 revealed enhanced values for the oddball-like tactile task, but decreased values for the tactile one-back task. This indicates that previously obtained conflicting results might be due to different central mechanisms induced by different task requirements.

[1]  P. Michie,et al.  Selective Attention Effects on Somatosensory Event‐Related Potentials , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  D. S. Barth,et al.  Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Larry E. Roberts,et al.  Functional Organization of Primary Somatosensory Cortex Depends on the Focus of Attention , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Tuning curve shift by attention modulation in cortical neurons: a computational study of its mechanisms. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Hari,et al.  Separate finger representations at the human second somatosensory cortex , 1990, Neuroscience.

[8]  E. Schröger,et al.  ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Interaction between afferent input from fingers in human somatosensory cortex , 1995, Brain Research.

[10]  M. Erb,et al.  fMRI Evaluation of Somatotopic Representation in Human Primary Motor Cortex , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  Yoko Hoshi,et al.  Attention induces reciprocal activity in the human somatosensory cortex enhancing relevant- and suppressing irrelevant inputs from fingers , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  F. Mauguière,et al.  Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120‐to‐N140 trasition , 1995 .

[13]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  T. Wager,et al.  Performance-dependent inhibition of pain by an executive working memory task , 2010, PAIN®.

[15]  Ralph Huonker,et al.  Reduction of somatosensory evoked fields in the primary somatosensory cortex in a one-back task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J E Desmedt,et al.  The cognitive P40, N60 and P100 components of somatosensory evoked potentials and the earliest electrical signs of sensory processing in man. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Mechanisms of early selective attention in auditory and visual modalities. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[18]  Ralph Huonker,et al.  Rapid functional plasticity of the somatosensory cortex after finger amputation , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  Attentional modulation of firing rate and synchrony in a model cortical network , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[20]  Nicolas J. Kerscher,et al.  State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex , 1998, Nature.

[21]  Y. Okada,et al.  Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  R. Gregory,et al.  Origin of Eyes and Brains , 1967, Nature.

[23]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[24]  F Mauguière,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain: a dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part II: Effects of stimulus rate, attention and stimulus detection. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  D Robertson,et al.  Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced‐paced cognitive tasks in man , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  C. Nicholson,et al.  MEG source models and physiology. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Transient Storage of a Tactile Memory Trace in Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Matti S. Hämäläinen,et al.  Dipole modelling of MEG rhythms in time and frequency domains , 2005, Brain Topography.

[30]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Attention Modulates Earliest Responses in the Primary Auditory and Visual Cortices , 2008, Neuron.

[31]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Christoph Stippich,et al.  Interaction of Tactile Input in the Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex—A Magnetoencephalographic Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  F. Rösler,et al.  Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Desmedt,et al.  Somatosensory decision tasks in man: easly and late components of the cerebral potentials evoked by stimulation of different fingers in random sequences. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Topography of Tactile Working Memory , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Michael M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of the hand in the cerebral cortex , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.