Potential use of random and linked SSR markers in establishing the true heterotic pattern in maize (Zea mays)

ABSTRACT Context. Establishment of true heterotic pattern in maize germplasm can increase the efficiency of hybrid breeding. Heterosis is dependent on the genetic diversity of parents and the extent of dominance at different loci. Estimation of genetic diversity through use of molecular markers is routine practice in maize breeding. Aims. The present study was designed to test whether simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers linked to yield-contributing traits are more reliable for heterotic grouping than random SSRs. Methods. Diallel crosses developed among 19 inbred lines were evaluated at multi-locations. The genotypes were also grouped using polymorphic random (50) and linked (47) SSRs. Key results. The crosses generated with lines belonging to different heterotic groups of linked SSR markers did not reveal any superiority over the crosses of the diallel set. By contrast, mean performance of inter-heterotic group crosses generated on the basis of random markers was superior to that of intra-heterotic crosses. Specific combining ability effects did not reveal any significant association with genetic distance of random or linked markers. Conclusions. The lack of improved efficiency of linked markers over random markers can be attributed to factors including the quantitative nature of the trait, genotype × environment interactions, genetic background of germplasm in which the markers are expressed, and multiple alleles. Implications. Markers linked to yield-contributing traits are no more reliable for heterotic grouping than random markers.

[1]  M. Choudhary,et al.  Heterosis in Genomic Era: Advances in the Molecular Understanding and Techniques for Rapid Exploitation , 2021 .

[2]  Xiaojie Xu,et al.  Large-Scale Analysis of Combining Ability and Heterosis for Development of Hybrid Maize Breeding Strategies Using Diverse Germplasm Resources , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[3]  J. Crossa,et al.  AGD-R (Analysis of Genetic Designs with R for Windows) Version 5.0 , 2020 .

[4]  M. Mikel,et al.  Diversity and heterotic patterns in North American proprietary dent maize germplasm , 2020 .

[5]  T. Rong,et al.  Heterotic grouping based on genetic variation and population structure of maize inbred lines from current breeding program in Sichuan province, Southwest China using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) , 2019, Molecular Breeding.

[6]  S. Saha,et al.  Molecular diversity and genetic variability of kernel tocopherols among maize inbreds possessing favourable haplotypes of γ-tocopherol methyl transferase (ZmVTE4) , 2018, Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[7]  F. Tardieu,et al.  The Physiological Basis of Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Scenario-Dependent Probabilistic Approach. , 2018, Annual review of plant biology.

[8]  Xiaocui Wang,et al.  Genetic Analysis and QTL Detection on Fiber Traits Using Two Recombinant Inbred Lines and Their Backcross Populations in Upland Cotton , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[9]  O. P. Yadav,et al.  Doubling maize (Zea mays) production of India by 2025 – Challenges and opportunities , 2016, The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.

[10]  B. Liu,et al.  Identification and validation of QTLs controlling multiple traits in sorghum , 2016, Crop and Pasture Science.

[11]  Emilie J. Millet,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Yield in Europe: Allelic Effects Vary with Drought and Heat Scenarios. , 2016, Plant physiology.

[12]  A. Melchinger.  Genetic Diversity and Heterosis , 2015 .

[13]  M. Choudhary,et al.  Microsatellite marker-based genetic diversity analyses of novel maize inbreds possessing rare allele of β-carotene hydroxylase (crtRB1) for their utilization in β-carotene enrichment , 2015, Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[14]  P. H. Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of genotype × environment interactions for grain yield in maize hybrids in rainfed environments. , 2014 .

[15]  Cheng Liu,et al.  Quantitative trait loci mapping for yield components and kernel-related traits in multiple connected RIL populations in maize , 2013, Euphytica.

[16]  P. Srinives,et al.  Genetic distance and heterotic pattern among single cross hybrids within waxy maize (Zea mays L.). , 2012 .

[17]  F. Hossain,et al.  Identification of kernel iron- and zinc-rich maize inbreds and analysis of genetic diversity using microsatellite markers , 2011, Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[18]  Mei Yang,et al.  Detection of QTL for phosphorus efficiency at vegetative stage in Brassica napus , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[19]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Drought stress and tropical maize: QTL-by-environment interactions and stability of QTLs across environments for yield components and secondary traits , 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  Xinhua Zhao,et al.  A intervarietal genetic map and QTL analysis for yield traits in wheat , 2007, Molecular Breeding.

[21]  A. Myburg,et al.  Genetic diversity of African maize inbred lines revealed by SSR markers. , 2007, Hereditas.

[22]  C. Barata,et al.  Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data , 2006, Euphytica.

[23]  S. Xue,et al.  Molecular genetic analysis of five spike-related traits in wheat using RIL and immortalized F2 populations , 2006, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[24]  A. P. Souza,et al.  Mapping QTL for Grain Yield and Plant Traits in a Tropical Maize Population , 2006, Molecular Breeding.

[25]  Kejun Liu,et al.  PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis , 2005, Bioinform..

[26]  J. Doebley,et al.  An Analysis of Genetic Diversity Across the Maize Genome Using Microsatellites , 2005, Genetics.

[27]  A. Melake-Berhan,et al.  Grouping of tropical mid-altitude maize inbred lines on the basis of yield data and molecular markers , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[28]  T. A. Campbell,et al.  Comparisons of genetic and morphological distance with heterosis between Medicago sativa subsp. sativa and subsp. falcata , 2003, Euphytica.

[29]  C. Pacheco,et al.  Heterotic groups based on yield-specific combining ability data and phylogenetic relationship determined by RAPD markers for 28 tropical maize open pollinated varieties , 2001, Euphytica.

[30]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity , 1992, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[31]  J. Reif,et al.  Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[32]  Xavier Perrier,et al.  Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Tropical Plants , 2003 .

[33]  Yang Jun-yun.  Heterotic grouping for tropical and temperate maize inbreds by analyzing combining ability and SSR markers , 2003 .

[34]  M. Bohn,et al.  Genetic Characterization of CIMMYT Inbred Maize Lines and Open Pollinated Populations Using Large Scale Fingerprinting Methods , 2002 .

[35]  Walter Sermeus,et al.  Data analysis methods. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[36]  Soo-Jin Kwon,et al.  Relationship between heterosis and genetic divergence in ‘Tongil’‐type rice , 2001 .

[37]  R. Bernardo.  Breeding Potential of Intra‐ and Interheterotic Group Crosses in Maize , 2001 .

[38]  C. L. Souza,et al.  Genetic diversity in tropical maize inbred lines: heterotic group assignment and hybrid performance determined by RFLP markers. , 2000 .

[39]  M. Warburton,et al.  [Comparison of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines based on RFLPs, SSRs, AFLPs and RAPDs]. , 2000, Yi chuan xue bao = Acta genetica Sinica.

[40]  L. B. Mhase,et al.  Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[41]  Byung Han Choi,et al.  The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops , 1997 .

[42]  John M. Martin,et al.  Hybrid Performance in Wheat as Related to Parental Diversity , 1995 .

[43]  W. F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .