No difference in clinical outcomes between portable navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised trial

Portable accelerometer‐based navigation devices (PAD) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been proposed to combine the alignment precision of computer navigation with the efficiency of conventional instrumentation (CON). The aim of this study was to determine if PAD was more effective than CON in TKA in improving clinical outcomes at medium term follow‐up.

[1]  Zaid Shihab,et al.  Handheld, accelerometer‐based navigation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta‐analysis , 2020, ANZ journal of surgery.

[2]  Arun Mullaji,et al.  Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Computer-Assisted vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality, Prospective Studies. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Radiographic assessment and clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device , 2018, Arthroplasty today.

[4]  G. Goh,et al.  Accelerometer-Based and Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Reduction in Mechanical Axis Outliers Does Not Lead to Improvement in Functional Outcomes or Quality of Life When Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Junya Higuchi,et al.  Comparison of an Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation System, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Conventional Instrumentation for Femoral Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2017, Knee surgery & related research.

[6]  I. Harris,et al.  Accelerometer-Based, Portable Navigation (KneeAlign) vs Conventional Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  G. Goh,et al.  Accelerometer-Based Navigation Is as Accurate as Optical Computer Navigation in Restoring the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Matched Study. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  W. Bugbee,et al.  Accuracy of A Handheld Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Femoral and Tibial Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  Yen-Liang Liu,et al.  Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-based system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  M. Cross,et al.  Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  Peter F. M. Choong,et al.  Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[15]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[16]  E. Roos,et al.  WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.