Random forest regression for predicting an anomalous condition on a UR10 cobot end-effector from purposeful failure data

Abstract Unexpected downtime from equipment failure has increased due to a production line’s mechanization to meet production throughput requirements. Manufacturing equipment requires accurate prediction models for determining future failure probability in maintenance scheduling. This paper explores using generated failure data under contrived failure scenarios in training a model for a robot with different combinations of data features. Failure data are generated by inducing an anomalous state in the robot arm. The anomalous state is created by attaching weights at the robot end-effector. A random forest regression model diagnoses the anomalous state and determines the anomalous state progression after gathering data. Three different regression models were trained to test accuracy based on different feature selections. The random forest regression predicted 92% of the robot joint operations through five-fold cross-validation, an anomaly in a robot joint 99% of the time, and the correct anomaly state-based on the confusion matrix, 85% of the time. In future research, the anomalous state will represent more targeted component failures on the system through purposeful permanent damage of the robots’ components. Future datasets generated will train other machine health algorithms for estimating component and system damage.

[1]  Nam H. Kim,et al.  Options for Prognostics Methods: A review of data-driven and physics-based prognostics , 2013 .

[2]  Walter Sextro,et al.  Condition Monitoring of Bearing Damage in Electromechanical Drive Systems by Using Motor Current Signals of Electric Motors: A Benchmark Data Set for Data-Driven Classification , 2016, PHM Society European Conference.

[3]  André Carvalho Bittencourt,et al.  A Data-driven Method for Monitoring Systems that Operate Repetitively -Applications to Wear Monitoring in an Industrial Robot Joint1 , 2012 .

[4]  Puqiang Zhang,et al.  Data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization and k-nearest neighbor regression for estimating capacity of lithium-ion battery , 2014 .

[5]  P. D. McFadden,et al.  Model for the vibration produced by a single point defect in a rolling element bearing , 1984 .

[6]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[7]  Yi-Chi Wang,et al.  Application of reinforcement learning for agent-based production scheduling , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Narrendar RaviChandran,et al.  Genetic algorithms and unsupervised machine learning for predicting robotic manipulation failures for force-sensitive tasks , 2018, 2018 4th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR).

[9]  Yuyun Zeng,et al.  Real-time condition monitoring and fault detection of components based on machine-learning reconstruction model , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[10]  Lubna Mahmoud Abu Zohair Prediction of Student’s performance by modelling small dataset size , 2019 .

[11]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications , 2016 .

[12]  Jovica V. Milanovic,et al.  Estimation of Cost of Downtime of Industrial Process Due to Voltage Sags , 2011 .

[13]  Yusri Yusof,et al.  Machine monitoring system: a decade in review , 2020, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[14]  Roger V. Bostelman,et al.  Literature Review of Mobile Robots for Manufacturing , 2015 .

[15]  Bernd Kuhlenkötter,et al.  Systematic review on machine learning (ML) methods for manufacturing processes – Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) methods for field application , 2020 .

[16]  Derya Birant,et al.  Machine learning and data mining in manufacturing , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  J. R. Llata,et al.  Working Together: A Review on Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Environments , 2017, IEEE Access.

[18]  Guangjun Liu,et al.  Power efficiency estimation based health monitoring and fault detection of modular and reconfigurable robot , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics.

[19]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study , 2015 .

[20]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[21]  László Monostori,et al.  Lead time prediction using machine learning algorithms: A case study by a semiconductor manufacturer , 2018 .

[22]  Amanpreet Singh,et al.  A review of supervised machine learning algorithms , 2016, 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom).

[23]  Brian A. Weiss,et al.  A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing , 2019, J. Intell. Manuf..

[24]  Hai Qiu,et al.  Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on rolling element bearing prognostics , 2006 .

[25]  J. Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design , 2008 .

[26]  Daming Lin,et al.  A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance , 2006 .

[27]  John T. Renwick,et al.  Vibration Analysis---A Proven Technique as a Predictive Maintenance Tool , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[28]  Michael Lütjen,et al.  Anomaly detection with convolutional neural networks for industrial surface inspection , 2019, Procedia CIRP.