Conditional tau coefficient for assessment of producer's accuracy of classified remotely sensed data

Abstract The error matrix is frequently used for accuracy assessment of the classification of remotely sensed data. The classification accuracy for each individual category is often expressed by the percentage correct classified and/or the conditional kappa coefficient. In the classification of remotely sensed data, the distribution of the reference data over various categories is often unknown beforehand. In such cases, conditional kappa may give erroneous estimates of classification accuracy. An alternative measure for classification accuracy of individual categories is proposed. It is denoted as conditional tau, and it expresses the agreement obtained after removal of the random agreement expected by chance. Formulae for computation of conditional tau appropriate for classifications based on equal and unequal probabilities of category membership are presented. Three numerical examples are used to demonstrate the calculation and interpretation of the measure. In the examples, conditional tau correctly estimates the classification accuracy, whilst the results show that conditional kappa may overestimate as well as underestimate the classification accuracy.

[1]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[2]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[3]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[4]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[5]  G F Lawlis,et al.  Judgment of counseling process: reliability, agreement, and error. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Zhenkui Ma,et al.  Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data , 1995 .

[7]  Erik Njesset A method to test for systematic differences between maps and reality using error matrices , 1995 .

[8]  R. Congalton A Quantitative Method to Test for Consistency and Correctness in Photointerpretation , 1983 .

[9]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[10]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  On the compensation for chance agreement in image classification accuracy assessment, Photogram , 1992 .

[11]  R. Light Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. , 1971 .

[12]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[13]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. , 1983 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[15]  Dale J. Prediger,et al.  Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives , 1981 .