Analysis of Contradictions in Online Collaborative Learning using Activity Theory as Analytical Framework

While previous studies have cited the benefits of incorporating online collaborative learning (OCL) in teaching and learning, there are also shortcomings of OCL that should not be ignored. This study aimed to investigate the constraints of incorporating OCL in a Malaysian tertiary classroom using Activity Theory as analytical framework. Activity Theory proved to be useful, particularly for OCL, because it provided a structure for identifying internal contradictions, also referred as tensions or constraints as result of interaction by the components of the OCL. Hence, the objectives of this paper are twofold: to identify constraints of OCL as perceived by students; and to investigate their suggestions or recommendations for improvement of OCL. The findings indicated two keys constraints: technology-related contradictions, which are related to desire for synchronous feedback in forum discussions, cut and paste and plagiarism of ideas, and other technological distractions; and group discussion contradictions. These refer to repetitive and mixed-up postings, clashes on topics of discussion, and discussions being too formal. Suggestions for improvement are reported by students regarding aspects of personalizing an online collaborative learning template; and providing additional support for collaborating online.

[1]  M. Miles,et al.  The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[3]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[4]  S. Barab,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Conceptualize Online Community and Using Online Community to Conceptualize Activity Theory , 2004 .

[5]  Robin Mason,et al.  e-Learning and Social Networking Handbook: Resources for Higher Education , 2008 .

[6]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[7]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[8]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice , 2002 .

[9]  Tim S. Roberts Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[10]  Abdul Razak Idris,et al.  Technology-enhanced Classroom Learning Community for Promoting Tertiary ICT Education Learning in Malaysia , 2013 .

[11]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[12]  G. Bull,et al.  Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 2009 .

[13]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[14]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Regina O. Smith,et al.  Thinking Out of a Bowl of Spaghetti: Learning to Learn in Online Collaborative Groups , 2004 .

[17]  Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Understand the Systemic Tensions Characterizing a Technology-Rich Introductory Astronomy Course , 2002 .

[18]  Mary R. Lea,et al.  Distributed Learning : Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice , 2013 .

[19]  Harry Daniels,et al.  Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice , 2009 .

[20]  W. E. Burghardt DuBois,et al.  Education and Work , 1932 .

[21]  Ines Langemeyer Contradictions in Expansive Learning , 2012 .

[22]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[23]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[24]  Jamalludin Harun,et al.  E-learning research and development experiences related to learning computer science, information technology and multimedia subjects , 2006 .

[25]  David R . Russell Looking beyond the interface: activity theory and distributed learning : Activity theory and distributed learning David R. Russell , 2003 .

[26]  Europe Singh,et al.  Learning theory and online technologies , 2014 .

[27]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[28]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[29]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Computer-Mediated Learning Groups: Benefits and Challenges to Using Groupwork in Online Learning Environments , 2004 .

[30]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[31]  B. Rogoff The Cultural Nature of Human Development , 2003 .

[32]  Bosung Kim,et al.  Teacher Perspectives on Online Collaborative Learning: Factors Perceived as Facilitating and Impeding Successful Online Group Work , 2008 .

[33]  Y. Engeström Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[34]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Pedagogical Adeptness in the Design of E-learning Environments: Experiences from the Lab@Future Project , 2003 .