Making the Transition from Welfare to Work: Employment Experiences of CalWORKs Participants in the San Francisco Bay Area

ABSTRACT This study describes welfare-to-work participants in the San Francisco Bay Area, support services, experiences with the CalWORKs program, and predictors of employment status in the wake of welfare reform. Findings indicate that many are working and more Stayers and Recidivists than Leavers are using food stamps and Medi-Cal. Multivariate analysis reveals that race and financial supports were the significant factors contributing to employability, defined as the ability to secure employment despite the need to supplement earned income with welfare payments. To help people stay off of welfare, case management services are needed to help participants maintain employment and increase job skills. In addition to expanding our understanding of human behavior within the social environment of poverty, implications for practice and policy are identified.

[1]  M. Austin,et al.  Human Behavior and the Social Environment: Exploring Conceptual Foundations , 2008 .

[2]  M. Austin,et al.  Assessing the Initial Impact of Welfare Reform , 2005 .

[3]  M. Austin,et al.  Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Understanding the Social Environment , 2005 .

[4]  S. Zedlewski.  Recent Trends in Food Stamp Participation: Have New Policies Made a Difference? , 2004 .

[5]  A. London,et al.  Welfare Reform, Work-Family Tradeoffs, and Child Well-Being* , 2004 .

[6]  Nancy E. Wemmerus,et al.  Experiences of Virginia Time Limit Families After Case Closure: 18-Month Followup with Cases Closed in Early 1998, 1999, and 2000. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research , 2003 .

[7]  Karen C. Tumlin,et al.  Immigrants and TANF: A Look at Immigrant Welfare Recipients in Three Cities. Occasional Paper. Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies. , 2003 .

[8]  D. Flaming,et al.  Prisoners of Hope: Welfare to Work in Los Angeles , 2003 .

[9]  Marie Wång.  The Decline in Medicaid Use by Noncitizens since Welfare Reform , 2003 .

[10]  S. Danziger,et al.  Barriers to Employment and the ‘Hard to Serve’: Implications for Services, Sanctions, and Time Limits , 2003, Social Policy and Society.

[11]  S. Zedlewski.  Families Coping without Earnings or Government Cash Assistance , 2003 .

[12]  S. Danziger,et al.  Does It Pay to Move from Welfare to Work , 2002 .

[13]  S. Zedlewski.  The Importance of Housing Benefits to Welfare Success , 2002 .

[14]  Gretchen Kirby,et al.  Transitional Jobs Programs: Stepping Stones to Unsubsidized Employment. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research , 2002 .

[15]  R. Moffitt,et al.  The Characteristics of Families Remaining on Welfare. Working Paper. Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study. , 2002 .

[16]  G. Acs.  Final Synthesis Report of Findings from ASPE'S 'Leavers' Grants , 2001 .

[17]  D. Polit,et al.  Is Work Enough? The Experiences of Current and Former Welfare Mothers Who Work. , 2001 .

[18]  R. Bavier.  Welfare Reform Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation , 2001 .

[19]  J. A. Garcia,et al.  Barriers to Employment for Welfare Recipients , 2001 .

[20]  S. Blank,et al.  Welfare, Housing, and Employment: Learning from the Jobs-Plus Demonstration. MDRC Policy Brief. , 2001 .

[21]  P. Loprest.  How Are Families That Left Welfare Doing? A Comparison of Early and Recent Welfare Leavers. New Federalism: National Survey of America's Families, Series B, No. B-36. Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program To Assess Changing Social Policies. , 2001 .

[22]  S. Zedlewski.  Former Welfare Families Continue to Leave the Food Stamp Program , 2001 .

[23]  R. Moffitt,et al.  The Diversity of Welfare Leavers. Welfare, Children, and Families: A Three-City Study. Working Paper. , 2000 .

[24]  M. Corcoran,et al.  How Welfare Reform is Affecting Women's Work , 2000 .

[25]  K. Moore,et al.  Sociodemographic Risk and Child Well-Being. New Federalism: National Survey of America's Families, Series B, No. B-18. Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program To Assess Changing Social Policies. , 2000 .

[26]  P. Loprest.  Current and Former Welfare Recipients: How Do They Differ? , 1999 .

[27]  P. Loprest.  Families Who Left Welfare: Who Are They and How Are They Doing? , 1999 .

[28]  P. Loprest,et al.  Where Are They Now? What States' Studies of People Who Left Welfare Tell Us. Assessing the New Federalism. An Urban Institute Program To Assess Changing Social Policies. Series A, No. A-32. , 1999 .

[29]  G. Elder,et al.  The life course as developmental theory. , 1998, Child development.

[30]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. , 1995, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[31]  B. Wolfe,et al.  The Employment , Earnings , and Income of Single Mothers in Wisconsin Who Left Cash Assistance : Comparisons among Three Cohorts , 2003 .

[32]  P. Loprest.  How Are Families That Left Welfare Doing? , 2001 .

[33]  J. Holahan,et al.  Health insurance coverage after welfare. , 2000, Health affairs.

[34]  S. Zedlewski.  Work-Related Activities and Limitations of Current Welfare Recipients , 1999 .

[35]  G. Duncan,et al.  The effects of poverty on children. , 1997, The Future of children.

[36]  A. Pickles,et al.  Understanding individual differences in environmental-risk exposure. , 1995 .

[37]  Elder,et al.  The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. , 1995 .

[38]  J. Clausen.  Gender, contexts, and turning points in adults' lives. , 1995 .

[39]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Economic Stress in Lives: Developmental Perspectives , 1988 .

[40]  J. Lane.  Final Report: "Successful Transitions out of Low-Wage Work for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Recipients: The Role of Employers, Coworkers, and Location" , 1800 .