Understanding the dynamic nature of technological change using trajectory identification based on patent citation network in the Electric Vehicles industry

Since the 1990s, Electric Vehicles (EV) have experienced a significant rate of growth marked by a continuing period of significant technological change. It is argued that technological changes have been taking place along ordered and selective patterns in the potential paradigmatic shift of EV evolution. A patent based method is employed in this research to observe the technology evolution and to identify the dynamic changes of technological trajectories by applying network-based methodologies to patents and patent citation. Compared with the previous literature on technological trajectory research, which conducted a historical descriptive analysis alone or considered the technology development process as a whole without dividing different phases to identify the dynamic technological trajectory, this paper highlights the dynamic nature of technological evolution in the development process and improves the accuracy of analysis of the key technological trajectories. Together with the empirical study on the technology evolution of EV, this paper not only proposes a dynamic identification method of technological trajectory, but also describes the process of technology changes in detail. In addition, this approach helps to position the development path of an object technology and thus is utilized in designing the R&D strategy for the enterprises, countries and regions.

[1]  Arianna Martinelli,et al.  An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry , 2012 .

[2]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[3]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[4]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[5]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[6]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[7]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms , 1992 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[9]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[10]  Alan Pilkington,et al.  Innovation in disruptive regulatory environments: A patent study of electric vehicle technology development , 2006 .

[11]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[12]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[13]  Holger Ernst,et al.  The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry , 1997 .

[14]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[15]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Innovation forecasting , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[16]  Fernando Jiménez-Sáez,et al.  Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks , 2011 .

[17]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[18]  C. C. Chan,et al.  An overview of electric vehicle technology , 1993, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  C. C. Chan,et al.  The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents , 2013 .

[21]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[22]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge , 2007 .

[23]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis , 2003, ArXiv.

[24]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[25]  N. Rosenberg.  The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices , 1969, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[26]  C. C. Chan,et al.  The State of the Art of Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[28]  Robert van den Hoed,et al.  Sources of radical technological innovation: the emergence of fuel cell technology in the automotive industry , 2007 .

[29]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[30]  宮崎 久美子,et al.  Product Innovations of Embedded Software in Mobile Phones : An Empirical Analysis Based on the Functions Realized by Embedded Software , 2012 .

[31]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of keyword search strategy for patent identification , 2013 .

[32]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Patent statistics: deciphering a ‘real’ versus a ‘pseudo’ proxy of innovation , 2001 .

[33]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[34]  Robert W. Shaw,et al.  The strategic management of technology , 1983 .