A comparison of the ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance with the modified Mallampati and the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the ability to predict difficult visualization of the larynx from the following preoperative airway predictive indices, in isolation and combination: modified Mallampati test (MMT), the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) and the Upper-Lip-Bite test (ULBT). Methods: We collected data on 603 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation and then evaluated all three factors before surgery. An experienced anesthesiologist, not informed of the recorded preoperative airway evaluation, performed the laryngoscopy and grading (as per Cormack and Lehane's classification). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Curve and the area under ROC curve (AUC) for each airway predictor in isolation and in combination were determined. Results: Difficult laryngoscopy (Grade 3 or 4) occurred in 41 (6.8%) patients. The main endpoint of the present study, the AUC of the ROC, was significantly lower for the MMT (AUC, 0.511; 95% CI, 0.470–0.552) than the ULBT (AUC, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.671–0.745, P=0.002) and the RHTMD score (AUC, 0.711; 95% CI, 0.673–0.747, P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the AUC of the ROC for the ULBT and the RHTMD score. By using discrimination analysis, the optimal cutoff point for the RHTMD for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 21.06 (sensitivity, 75.6%; specificity, 58.5%). Conclusion: The RHTMD is comparable with ULBT for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in general population.

[1]  K. Roberts,et al.  Evaluation of the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult laryngoscopy. , 2010, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[2]  H. Prabhakar,et al.  Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in Acromegaly: A Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test With Modified Mallampati Classification , 2010, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[3]  M. Rasouli,et al.  The Diagnostic Value of the Upper Lip Bite Test Combined with Sternomental Distance, Thyromental Distance, and Interincisor Distance for Prediction of Easy Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Study , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  J. Secrest,et al.  A comparison of preoperative airway assessment techniques: the modified Mallampati and the upper lip bite test. , 2007, AANA journal.

[5]  E. Cabanis,et al.  Three‐dimensional procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form , 2007, Anatomical record.

[6]  Gurpreet Singh,et al.  Prediction of difficult mask ventilation , 2005, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[7]  C. Arndt,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of the Upper Lip Bite Test Compared with the Mallampati Classification to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy: An External Prospective Evaluation , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  D. Doyle Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[9]  Zahid Hussain Khan,et al.  A Comparison of the Upper Lip Bite Test (a Simple New Technique) with Modified Mallampati Classification in Predicting Difficulty in Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Blinded Study , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  H. Schmitt,et al.  Ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance improves prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. , 2002, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[11]  I. Calder Useless ritual? , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[12]  I. Tekdemir,et al.  Should We Reevaluate the Variables for Predicting the Difficult Airway in Anesthesiology? , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  E. Crosby,et al.  The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management , 1998, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  K. Karkouti,et al.  Inter-observer reliability of ten tests used for predicting difficult tracheal intubation. , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[15]  D. Rocke,et al.  Sternomental distance as the sole predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric anaesthesia. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  R. Williamson Predicting difficult laryngoscopy , 1996, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[17]  R. McCarthy,et al.  Preoperative Airway Assessment: Predictive Value of a Multivariate Risk Index , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  E. Rimm,et al.  Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation in Surgical Patients Scheduled for General Anesthesia: A Prospective Blind Study , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  A E Delilkan,et al.  Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  C. Berry,et al.  What Is the Best Way to Determine Oropharyngeal Classification and Mandihular Space Length to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy? , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[21]  J. Benumof Difficult laryngoscopy: obtaining the best view , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[22]  D. Rose,et al.  The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[23]  S. Dhara,et al.  Prediction of Difficult Laryngoscopy: An Assessment of the Thyromental Distance and Mallampati Predictive Tests , 1992, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[24]  W. Mapleson,et al.  Effects of posture, phonation and observer on Mallampati classification. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  K L Posner,et al.  Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[26]  J. Benumof,et al.  The Importance of Transtracheal Jet Ventilation in the Management of the Difficult Airway , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[27]  J. R. Young,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study , 1987, Anaesthesia.

[28]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  Mathematical partitioning of the receiver operating curve: A diagnostic tool for medical decision making , 1985 .

[29]  R S Cormack,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1983, Anaesthesia.

[30]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.