Ecosystem functioning in stream assemblages from different regions: contrasting responses to variation in detritivore richness, evenness and density.

1. The diversity of species traits in a biological assemblage varies not only with species richness, but also with species evenness and organism density, which together influence the concentration of traits within functional guilds. Potential trait diversity at local scales is also constrained by the regional species pool. Implications of such variation for spatio-temporal variability in biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships are likely to be complex, but are poorly understood. 2. In microcosm experiments conducted at laboratories in Sweden, Ireland and Romania, we investigated effects of species richness, evenness and density of stream-living detritivores on two related processes: detritivore leaf-processing efficiency (LPE) and growth. Assemblage composition varied among laboratories: one taxonomic order (Plecoptera) was studied in Sweden, whereas two orders, encompassing wider trait variation, were studied in Romania (Trichoptera and Plecoptera) and Ireland (Trichoptera and Isopoda). 3. Relationships between density and both LPE and growth ranged from negative to positive across the study species, highlighting the potential for density-dependent variation in process rates to alter ecosystem functioning, but indicating that such effects depend on species identity. 4. LPE varied with species diversity in the two more heterogeneous assemblages, but whereas LPE in the Romanian study was generally enhanced as richness increased, LPE in the Irish study increased only in less-even polycultures dominated by particular species. Transgressive overyielding was detected in the Irish experiment, indicating complementary resource use and/or facilitation (complementarity). These mechanisms could not be distinguished from the selection effect in the Romanian study. 5. Growth was elevated in Romanian species mixtures, reflecting positive complementarity, but lower than expected growth in some Swedish mixtures was associated with negative complementarity, indicating interspecific interference competition. 6. Our results emphasize the potential importance of detritivore diversity for stream ecosystem functioning, but both the effects of diversity on the studied processes, and the mechanisms underlying those effects, were specific to each assemblage and process. Such variability highlights challenges in generalizing impacts of diversity change for functional integrity in streams and other ecosystems in which the occurrence of important species traits fluctuates over relatively small spatio-temporal scales.

[1]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  J. Caffrey,et al.  The effect of weed control practices on macroinvertebrate communities in Irish Canals , 1996 .

[3]  P. Amarasekare Diversity–stability relationships in multitrophic systems: an empirical exploration , 2003 .

[4]  Gessner,et al.  Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders from temperate and tropical streams , 2001 .

[5]  Bradley J. Cardinale,et al.  Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems , 2006, Nature.

[6]  M. Garcia,et al.  Plant growth and microbial activity in a tropical soil amended with faecal pellets from millipedes and woodlice , 2006 .

[7]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf‐eating, aquatic insects , 2000 .

[8]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[9]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  Biodiversity and aquatic food webs , 2005 .

[10]  J. Herrmann,et al.  Processing of two detritus types by lake‐dwelling shredders: species‐specific impacts and effects of species richness , 2005 .

[11]  B. Malmqvist Interactions in stream leaf packs : effects of a stonefly predator on detritivores and organic matter processing , 1993 .

[12]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[13]  A. Covich,et al.  Detritus processing by endemic and non-native Hawaiian stream invertebrates: a microcosm study of species-specific effects , 2003 .

[14]  M. Palmer,et al.  DISTURBANCE MODERATES BIODIVERSITY-ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM CADDISFLIES IN STREAM MESOCOSMS , 2002 .

[15]  N. Friberg,et al.  Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders , 1994 .

[16]  R. Pearson,et al.  Leaf breakdown in tropical streams: the role of different species in ecosystem functioning , 2006 .

[17]  L. Barmuta,et al.  The effects of willow and eucalypt leaves on feeding preference and growth of some Australian aquatic macroinvertebrates , 1999 .

[18]  Nessa E. O'Connor,et al.  BIODIVERSITY LOSS AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN NUMBER AND IDENTITY OF SPECIES , 2005 .

[19]  M. Huston,et al.  Evaluating the Relative Strengths of Biotic Versus Abiotic Controls on Ecosystem Processes , 2002 .

[20]  M. Palmer,et al.  Composition of speciose leaf litter alters stream detritivore growth, feeding activity and leaf breakdown , 2006, Oecologia.

[21]  M. Jonsson Species richness effects on ecosystem functioning increase with time in an ephemeral resource system , 2006 .

[22]  P. Calow,et al.  Importance of fungi in the diet of Gammarus pulex and Asellus aquaticus , 1993, Oecologia.

[23]  P. Cranston,et al.  Keystone coleopterans? Colonization by wood-feeding elmids of experimentally immersed woods in south-eastern Australia , 1998 .

[24]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[25]  J. Fox Interpreting the 'selection effect' of biodiversity on ecosystem function , 2005 .

[26]  S. Kohler,et al.  POPULATION REGULATION IN AN AQUATIC INSECT: THE ROLE OF DISEASE , 2001 .

[27]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[28]  P. Giller,et al.  Life history patterns of stream-dwelling caddis , 1999 .

[29]  S. Heard,et al.  Larval Performance and Association Within and Between Two Species of Hackberry Nipple Gall Insects, Pachypsylla spp. (Homoptera: Psyllidae) , 1998 .

[30]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Realistically Low Species Evenness Does Not Alter Grassland Species-Richness-Productivity Relationships , 2004 .

[31]  O. Dangles,et al.  Species richness–decomposition relationships depend on species dominance , 2004 .

[32]  R. Pearson,et al.  Intraspecific interference in a tropical stream shredder guild , 2006 .

[33]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments , 2004 .

[34]  U. Sommer Phosphorus-limited Daphnia: Intraspecific facilitation instead of competition , 1992 .

[35]  J. Duffy,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection , 2002 .

[36]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Do species evenness and plant density influence the magnitude of selection and complementarity effects in annual plant species mixtures , 2003 .

[37]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Mitigation or disturbance? Effects of liming on macroinvertebrate assemblage structure and leaf-litter decomposition in the humic streams of northern Sweden , 2006 .

[38]  C. Harley 3. Species Importance and Context: Spatial and Temporal Variation in Species Interactions , 2003 .

[39]  A. Ives,et al.  A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2004 .

[40]  Martin Solan,et al.  Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[41]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores , 2001 .

[42]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Leaf litter breakdown rates in boreal streams: does shredder species richness matter? , 2001 .

[43]  M. Kleiber Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[44]  Ian T. Carroll,et al.  Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Z. Pastuchová Macroinvertebrate assemblages in conditions of low-discharge streams of the Cerová vrchovina highland in Slovakia , 2006 .

[46]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses , 2003, Oecologia.

[47]  M. Loreau,et al.  Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters , 2002 .

[48]  O. Dangles,et al.  Simulating species loss following perturbation: assessing the effects on process rates , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  L. Rossi,et al.  Role of adult faeces in the nutrition of larvae of Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda) , 1978 .

[50]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.