Abstract This essay addresses two questions. It first asks what happens to security practices when they take species life as their referent object. It then asks what happens to security practices which take species life as their referent object when the very understanding of species life undergoes transformation and change. In the process of addressing these two questions the essay provides an exegesis of Michel Foucault’s analytic of biopolitics as a dispositif de sécurité and contrasts this account of security with that given by traditional geopolitical security discourses. The essay also theorises beyond Foucault when it interrogates the impact in the twentieth century of the compression of morbidity on populations and the molecular revolution on what we now understand life to be. It concludes that ‘population’, which was the empirical referent of early biopolitics, is being superseded by ‘heterogenesis’. This serves as the empirical referent for the recombinant biopolitics of security in the molecular age.
[1]
M. Dillon.
Governing through contingency: The security of biopolitical governance☆
,
2007
.
[2]
Stefan Elbe.
Strategic Implications of HIV/AIDS
,
2003
.
[3]
M. Reid,et al.
Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection
,
2005,
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
[4]
M. Dillon.
Virtual Security: A Life Science of (Dis)order
,
2003
.
[5]
Javier Lezaun,et al.
Creating a New Object of Government
,
2006
.
[6]
H. Rheinberger.
Beyond nature and culture. Modes of reasoning in the age of molecular biology
,
2000
.
[7]
M. Serres.
The Birth of Physics
,
2000
.
[8]
Michael Dillon,et al.
Intelligence Incarnate: Martial Corporeality in the Digital Age
,
2003
.