Supply Contract Design for Competing Heterogeneous Suppliers under Asymmetric Information

This study considers a supply chain with two heterogeneous suppliers and a common retailer whose type is either low-volume or high-volume. The retailer's type is unknown to the suppliers. The flexible supplier has a high variable cost and a low fixed cost, while the efficient supplier has a low variable cost and a high fixed cost. Each supplier offers the retailer a menu of contracts. The retailer chooses the contract that maximizes its expected profit. For this setting, we characterize the equilibrium contract menus offered by the suppliers to the retailer. We find that the equilibrium contract menus depend on which supplier–retailer match can generate the highest supply chain profit and on how much information rent the supplier may need to pay. An important feature of the equilibrium contract menus is that the contract assigned to the more profitable retailer will coordinate the supply chain, while the contract assigned to the less profitable retailer may not. In addition, in some circumstances, the flexible supplier may choose not to serve the high-volume retailer, in order to avoid excessive information rent.

[1]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Competing Manufacturers in a Retail Supply Chain: On Contractual Form and Coordination , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Supply Chain Sourcing Under Asymmetric Information , 2007 .

[5]  Ruina Yang,et al.  Supply chain contracting with competing suppliers under asymmetric information , 2013 .

[6]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Commitment-penalty contracts in drop-shipping supply chains with asymmetric demand information , 2010 .

[7]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Impacts of Power Structure on Supply Chains with Uncertain Demand , 2013 .

[8]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Strategic Commitments for an Optimal Capacity Decision Under Asymmetric Forecast Information , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  Quantity Discounts in Single Period Supply Contracts with Asymmetric Demand Information , 2005 .

[10]  C. Corbett,et al.  A Supplier's Optimal Quantity Discount Policy Under Asymmetric Information , 2000 .

[11]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Better, Faster, Cheaper: An Experimental Analysis of a Multiattribute Reverse Auction Mechanism with Restricted Information Feedback , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Contracting with asymmetric demand information in supply chains , 2011 .

[13]  Jihong Ou,et al.  Power structure and profitability in assembly supply chains , 2014 .

[14]  Sanjoy Ghose,et al.  Motivating Retail Marketing Effort: Optimal Contract Design , 2009 .

[15]  Zhaolin Li,et al.  Equity-Based Incentives and Supply Chain Buy-Back Contracts , 2012, Decis. Sci..

[16]  John H. Semple,et al.  Optimal Inventory Policy with Two Suppliers , 2006, Oper. Res..

[17]  Panos Kouvelis,et al.  Supply Chain Management Research and Production and Operations Management: Review, Trends, and Opportunities , 2006 .

[18]  Albert Y. Ha Supplier‐buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation , 2001 .

[19]  Mustafa Akan,et al.  Asymmetric Information and Economies of Scale in Service Contracting , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..