Transcallosal approach to the third ventricle: normative morphometric data based on magnetic resonance imaging scans, with special reference to the fornix and forniceal insertion.

OBJECTIVE The ability to visualize median-sagittal brain structures by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the planning for surgical removal of lesions located in and around the third ventricle. The transcallosal approach is the most appropriate path to the anterior part of the third ventricle. The present study was undertaken to obtain normative morphometric data, derived from sagittal MRI scans, which are necessary for operation planning that takes into account the surgical microanatomy and landmarks encountered during this approach. METHODS The morphometric evaluation was performed on 72 median-sagittal MRI scans. The surface landmarks for the corridor were the two points, P5 and P7, located 5 and 7 cm anterior to the central sulcus, respectively. With these two points on the cortical surface as references, a variety of measurements were made to provide quantitative information about distances between brain structures encountered during the surgical approach. In addition, various parameters were determined to characterize the different shapes of the fornix and the different types of forniceal insertion. RESULTS The following measurements (means) were obtained: 1) the distance between P5/P7 and the cingulate sulcus was 25.76 mm (range, 17.113-42.73 mm) with reference to P5, and 25.41 mm (range, 12.91-36.29 mm) with reference to P7; 2) the distance between the cingulate sulcus and the corpus callosum was 12.91 mm (range, 7.19-22.60 mm) with reference to P5, and 12.92 mm (range, 6.75-23.37 mm) with reference to P7; 3) the height of the corpus callosum was 6.22 mm (range, 3.07-9.00 mm) with reference to P5, and 6.92 mm (range, 3.50-13.57 mm) with reference to P7; 4) the distance between the anterior commissure and the foramen of Monro was 6.78 mm (range, 1.86-14.57 mm), independent of P5 and P7; 5) the distance between the lower margin of the corpus callosum and the upper insertion point of the fornix was 12.44 mm (range, 2.71-26.13 mm) with reference to P5, and 13.34 mm (range, 3.74-27.58 mm) with reference to P7; 6) the distance between the lower margin of the corpus callosum and the lower insertion point of the fornix was 18.08 mm (range, 9.47-29.71 mm) with reference to P5, and 18.58 mm (range, 10.48-30.40 mm) with reference to P7; and 7) the distance between the lower margin of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure was 23.46 mm (range, 11.98-32.70 mm) with reference to P5, and 22.89 mm (range, 11.05-33.04 mm) with reference to P7. Four different insertion types between the fornix and the corpus callosum were noted and classified. CONCLUSION Morphometric data concerning the surrounding structures of the third ventricle have received very little attention in the literature. This morphometric study permitted definition of the surgical corridor to the third ventricle by preserving important anatomic structures such as the motor strip, genu of the corpus callosum, forniceal commissure (hippocampal commissure), anterior commissure, and forniceal columns. The detailed morphometric data obtained on median-sagittal MRI scans of the brain structures involved in the transcallosal interforniceal and/or transcallosal transforaminal approach allow for exact planning of the surgical approach.

[1]  M. Apuzzo,et al.  Transcallosal, interfornicial approaches for lesions affecting the third ventricle: surgical considerations and consequences. , 1982, Neurosurgery.

[2]  E. Busch A NEW APPROACH FOR THE REMOVAL OF TUMORS OF THE THIRD VENTRICLE , 1944 .

[3]  A. Rhoton,et al.  Transchoroidal approach to the third ventricle: an anatomic study of the choroidal fissure and its clinical application. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[4]  E. Wenger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum using MR: correlation of measurements with aging in healthy individuals. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  A. Rhoton,et al.  Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part 2. Operative approaches. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[6]  R. Sperry,et al.  Memory impairment after commissurotomy in man. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  H. Coxeter,et al.  Introduction to Geometry. , 1961 .

[8]  M. Mishkin Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus , 1978, Nature.

[9]  S. S. Allen,et al.  TUMORS OF THE THIRD VENTRICLE , 1932 .

[10]  B. Stein Third ventricular tumors. , 1980, Clinical neurosurgery.

[11]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[12]  S. Weis,et al.  The transcallosal interforniceal approach to the third ventricle: anatomic and microsurgical aspects. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[13]  J Lang,et al.  Topographic anatomy of preformed intracranial spaces. , 1992, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[14]  M. Cossu,et al.  Subchoroidal approach to the third ventricle. Microsurgical anatomy. , 1984, Surgical neurology.

[15]  M. Yașargil,et al.  The transcallosal-transforaminal approach to the third ventricle with regard to the venous variations in this region. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.