Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective

We postulate that the causes of the problem of invasive alien species are primarily economic and, as such, require economic solutions. Invasive alien species are of increasing concern for four reasons. First, introductions are increasing sharply, while mechanisms for excluding or eradicating alien species have been either withdrawn or progressively weakened. Both trends are due to the liberalization of and increase in international travel and trade, an economic phenomenon. Second, the costs of invasions are rising rapidly due partly to increasing human population density, and partly to increasing intensity of production in genetically impoverished agricultural systems. Third, biological invasions are associated with a high degree of uncertainty both because they involve novel interactions, and because invasion risks are endogenous. Actual risks depend on how people react to the possibility of invasions. Fourth, the exclusion and control of invasive species is a "weakest-link" public good. This places the well-being of society in the hands of the least effective provider. We argue that an economic solution to the problem of invasive species has two components. One is to use incentives to change human behavior so as to enhance protection against the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive behavior. The other is to develop institutions that support the weakest members of global society, converting a "weakest-link" to a "best-shot" public good.

[1]  W. Lonsdale.  Inviting trouble: Introduced pasture species in northern Australia , 1994 .

[2]  M. Enserink.  Biological Invaders Sweep In , 1999, Science.

[3]  D. Delfino,et al.  Infectious diseases as invasives in human populations , 2000 .

[4]  K. A. Anaman,et al.  Economic assessment of preparedness strategies to prevent the introduction or the permanent establishment of screwworm fly in Australia , 1994 .

[5]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[6]  V. Heywood,et al.  Global Biodiversity Assessment , 1996 .

[7]  J. Shogren,et al.  Risk and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[8]  J. Turpie,et al.  Economic consequences of alien infestation of the Cape Floral Kingdom's Fynbos vegetation , 2000 .

[9]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  A Different Perspective on Plant Invasions@@@Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses , 2000 .

[10]  F. L. Leistritz,et al.  Assessing economic impacts of biological control of weeds: The case of leafy spurge in the northern Great Plains of the United States , 1999 .

[11]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[12]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  When to Ignore Advice: Invasion Predictions and Decision Theory , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[13]  V. Smith,et al.  Pricing What is Priceless: A Status Report on Non-Market Valuation of Environmental Resources , 1997 .

[14]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  The economics of an invading species: a theoretical model and case study application , 2000 .

[15]  J. Shogren.  Risk reduction strategies against the 'explosive invader' , 2000 .

[16]  S. Dalmazzone.  Economic Factors Affecting Vulnerability to Biological Invasions , 2000 .

[17]  Mark Williamson,et al.  The Economics of Biological Invasions , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[18]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States , 2000 .

[19]  J. Carlton,et al.  Introduction, dispersal and potential impacts of the green crab Carcinus maenas in San Francisco Bay, California , 1995, Marine Biology.

[20]  Lyle Glowka,et al.  A guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity , 1994 .

[21]  Robert Costanza,et al.  An ecological economic simulation model of mountain fynbos ecosystems: Dynamics, valuation and management , 1997 .

[22]  Marcel Rejmánek,et al.  Invasibility of plant communities , 1989 .