Multisite Study of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor Over 90 Days in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which enables real-time glucose display and trend information as well as real-time alarms, can improve glycemic control and quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus. Previous reports have described strategies to extend the useable lifetime of a single sensor from 1-2 weeks to 28 days. The present multisite study describes the characterization of a sensing platform achieving 90 days of continuous use for a single, fully implanted sensor. Method: The Senseonics CGM system is composed of a long-term implantable glucose sensor and a wearable smart transmitter. Study subjects underwent subcutaneous implantation of sensors in the upper arm. Eight-hour clinic sessions were performed every 14 days, during which sensor glucose values were compared against venous blood lab reference measurements collected every 15 minutes using mean absolute relative differences (MARDs). Results: All subjects (mean ± standard deviation age: 43.5 ± 11.0 years; with 10 sensors inserted in men and 14 in women) had type 1 diabetes mellitus. Most (22 of 24) sensors reported glucose values for the entire 90 days. The MARD value was 11.4 ± 2.7% (range, 8.1-19.5%) for reference glucose values between 40-400 mg/dl. There was no significant difference in MARD throughout the 90-day study (P = .31). No serious adverse events were noted. Conclusions: The Senseonics CGM, composed of an implantable sensor, external smart transmitter, and smartphone app, is the first system that uses a single sensor for continuous display of accurate glucose values for 3 months.

[1]  Michael Brownlee,et al.  Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c-independent risk factor for diabetic complications. , 2006, JAMA.

[2]  Sofia Dahlqvist,et al.  A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[3]  Barry H Ginsberg The Current Environment of CGM Technologies , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  Christina Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of a Novel System for Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  D. Klonoff Benefits and Limitations of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[6]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  The future of continuous glucose monitoring: closed loop. , 2008, Current diabetes reviews.

[7]  J. Brauker,et al.  Analysis of time lags and other sources of error of the DexCom SEVEN continuous glucose monitor. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[8]  Aesha Drozdowski,et al.  Standards of medical care in diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[9]  Xiaolin Wang,et al.  Algorithm for an implantable fluorescence based glucose sensor , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  David Kerr,et al.  Insulin Pump Therapy With Automated Insulin Suspension in Response to Hypoglycemia , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[11]  A. M. Kyaw,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes , 2013, Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.

[12]  David V. Power,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes: Response to position statement of the American Diabetes Association , 2006 .

[13]  G. Paolisso,et al.  Relationships Between Daily Acute Glucose Fluctuations and Cognitive Performance Among Aged Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[14]  Hui Jiang,et al.  Increased in vivo stability and functional lifetime of an implantable glucose sensor through platinum catalysis. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  Andrew DeHennis,et al.  Performance characterization of an abiotic and fluorescent-based continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2014, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with TRUstart Algorithm, a 1-Hour Warm-up Time , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[17]  J. Mastrototaro,et al.  The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[18]  C. Ionescu-Tirgoviste,et al.  The dynamics of life expectancy over the last six decades in elderly people with diabetes. , 2013, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[19]  Elizabeth Goyder,et al.  Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Steven J. Russell,et al.  A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Continuous Glucose Monitors , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[21]  Young Soon Jung A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: Guardian, G5 and Libre , 2017 .

[22]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[23]  J. Skyler The economic burden of diabetes and the benefits of improved glycemic control: the potential role of a continuous glucose monitoring system. , 2000, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[24]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Dexcom G4AP: An Advanced Continuous Glucose Monitor for the Artificial Pancreas , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[25]  L. Magni,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Using Subcutaneous Glucose Sensing and Insulin Delivery and a Model Predictive Control Algorithm: Preliminary Studies in Padova and Montpellier , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[26]  M. Porta,et al.  Achieving HbA1c targets in clinical trials and in the real world: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.