Long-term Effect of Experiencing System Malfunction on Driver Take-over Control in Conditional Driving Automation

The paper aims to investigate how driving experience on system malfunction impacts driver take-over control on a long-term basis when he or she uses the conditionally driving automation. We designed a two-factorial (driving experience $\times$ knowledge of system limitation) driving simulator experiment at training and practicing phases between which there was a two-month period. All seventy-two people ($36.2 \pm 15.6$ years old) participate into the data collection via driving simulators. The experimental results indicated that participants with the malfunction-experience at training reacted to a malfunction occurring at the two-month-later practicing phase. It is demonstrated that the experience was contributable for a long term. Also, it was shown that instructing the concept of the request to intervene (RtI) was attributed to rapidly taking-over car control. The effect of knowledge was significantly shown at the early training stage, and it was getting less as the driving experience was being accumulated. Furthermore, drivers' subjective assessment suggested that driver trust to driving automation would change with the accumulated experience. Meanwhile, the change was influenced by the acquired knowledge and experience at the training phase. Consequently, this study revealed the importance of experiencing system malfunction and instructing the knowledge at a learning/training period that will be helpful for drivers to achieve moderate driver-automation interaction.

[1]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle , 2014 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Niklas Strand,et al.  Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures , 2014 .

[4]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions , 2013 .

[5]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Human’s Overtrust in and Overreliance on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: A Theoretical Framework , 2013 .

[6]  Moritz Körber,et al.  Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Tina Mioch,et al.  Driver Readiness Model for Regulating the Transfer from Automation to Human Control , 2017, IUI.

[8]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  The Retention of Manual Flying Skills in the Automated Cockpit , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  The Impact of Explanation on Possibility of Hazard Detection Failure on Driver Intervention under Partial Driving Automation , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[10]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Monitoring an Automated System for a Single Failure: Vigilance and Task Complexity Effects , 1996 .

[12]  Annika F.L. Larsson,et al.  Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving , 2014 .

[13]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  How Does Knowledge about System Limitations Contribute to Interventions into Partial Automation Among Elderly Drivers? , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[14]  Alexandra Neukum,et al.  A Human-Machine Interface for Cooperative Highly Automated Driving , 2017 .

[15]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  What may happen or what you should do? Effects of knowledge representation regarding necessity of intervention on driver performance under level 2 automated driving , 2018, 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS).

[16]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .