The Theatre methodology for facilitating discussion in human-robot interaction on information disclosure in a home environment

Our research is concerned with developing scenarios for robot home companions as part of the EU project LIREC. In this work, we employed a particular methodology to gain user feedback in early stages of robot prototyping: the Theatre HRI (THRI) methodology which we have recently introduced in a pilot study. Extending this work, this study used a theatre presentation to convey the user experience of domestic service robots to a group of participants and to gain their feedback in order to further refine our scenarios. The play was designed both from the perspective of projected technological development of the LIREC project, as well as for facilitating engagement with an audience of secondary school students. At the end of the play the audience was involved in a discussion regarding issues such as acceptability of the scenario and the intra-household disclosure of information by the robot. Findings suggest that this methodology was effective in eliciting discussion with the audience and that problems related to intra-household disclosure of information were best resolved by clear-cut solutions tied to ownership and clear principles.

[1]  Bruce Christianson,et al.  Theatre as a Discussion Tool in Human-Robot Interaction Experiments - A Pilot Study , 2010, 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[2]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Evaluating extrovert and introvert behaviour of a domestic robot — a video study , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[4]  Dan Boneh,et al.  An Analysis of Private Browsing Modes in Modern Browsers , 2010, USENIX Security Symposium.

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  "He Knows When You Are Sleeping" : Privacy and the Personal Robot Companion , 2007 .

[6]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Automated Killers and the Computing Profession , 2007, Computer.

[7]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  Experience prototyping , 2000, DIS '00.

[8]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Integrating Sensing and Cueing for More Effective Activity Reminders , 2008, AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems.

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Video prototyping of dog-inspired non-verbal affective communication for an appearance constrained robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[10]  H. Huttenrauch,et al.  Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[11]  Colin Allen,et al.  E TH E L : Toward a Principled Ethical Eldercare Robot , 2022 .

[12]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Five reasons for scenario-based design , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[13]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[14]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Theatre as an intermediary between users and CHI designers , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  Everyday Life as a Stage in Creating and Performing Scenarios for Wireless Devices , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Tony Salvador,et al.  Focus troupe: using drama to create common context for new product concept end-user evaluations , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[18]  Rong Wang,et al.  Teenagers’ Internet Use and Family Rules: A Research Note , 2005 .

[19]  T.M. Duffy,et al.  Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development [Book Review] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[20]  A. Green,et al.  Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[21]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[22]  Wan Ching Ho,et al.  To Forget or Not to Forget : Towards a Roboethical Memory Control , 2009 .

[23]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[25]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The boy-robot should bark! : Children's impressions of agent migration into diverse embodiments , 2009 .

[26]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Companion Migration – Initial Participants’ Feedback from a Video-Based Prototyping Study , 2011 .

[27]  N. Sharkey,et al.  The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[28]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[29]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Video prototyping in human-robot interaction: results from a qualitative study , 2008, ECCE '08.