Design of a Non-Uniform High Impedance Surface for a Low Profile Antenna

Two Non-Uniform High Impedance Surfaces (NU-HIS or \tapered HIS) are proposed against a Uniform HIS (U-HIS). All surfaces are one dimensional (1D) and made of parallel wires with a length a little less than λ/2 around the resonance frequency. To show the effect of the surfaces, a half wavelength dipole antenna is placed over four different surfaces, PEC, U-HIS, NU-HIS, and modified NU-HIS (MNU-HIS) while the dipole height is fixed and very close to the surface. These four EM problems are analyzed numerically by the method of moments (MoM), and the results are compared. It is concluded that MNU-HIS yields more bandwidth than NU-HIS, and also, NU-HIS yields more bandwidth than U-HIS, while overall structures in all cases have identical volumes and nearly identical gains. This effect is attributed to the decrease in the sensitivity of the surfaces to the angle of incidence obtained by applying non-uniformity.

[1]  Zhan Li,et al.  PBG, PMC and PEC ground planes: a case study of dipole antennas , 2000, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Transmitting Waves of Progress to the Next Millennium. 2000 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (C.

[2]  Sergei A. Tretyakov,et al.  Angular stabilisation of resonant frequency of artificial magnetic conductors for TE-incidence , 2004 .

[3]  Tatsuo Itoh,et al.  A novel TEM waveguide using uniplanar compact photonic-bandgap (UC-PBG) structure , 1999 .

[4]  G. Poilasne Antennas on High Impedance Ground Planes: on the Importance of the Antenna Isolation , 2003 .

[5]  G. Manara,et al.  Synthesis of artificial magnetic conductors by using multilayered frequency selective surfaces , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[6]  M. Hakkak,et al.  Design of an AMC with Little Sensitivity to Angle of Incidence Using an Optimized Jerusalem Cross FSS , 2006, IEEE International Workshop on Antenna Technology Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials, 2006..

[7]  Nathan Marcuvitz Waveguide Handbook , 1951 .

[8]  P. de Maagt,et al.  High-impedance surfaces having stable resonance with respect to polarization and incidence angle , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  P. de Maagt,et al.  Artificial high-impedance surfaces: theoretical analysis for oblique incidence , 2003, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Sci. Meeting (Cat. No.03CH37450).

[10]  D. Sievenpiper,et al.  High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band , 1999 .

[11]  D. Werner,et al.  The design synthesis of multiband artificial magnetic conductors using high impedance frequency selective surfaces , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Agostino Monorchio,et al.  Synthesis of high-impedance FSSs using genetic algorithms , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37313).

[13]  Fan Yang,et al.  Mutual coupling reduction of microstrip antennas using electromagnetic band-gap structure , 2001, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2001 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37229).

[14]  K. Sarabandi,et al.  Antenna miniaturization and bandwidth enhancement using a reactive impedance substrate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Reflection phase characterizations of the EBG ground plane for low profile wire antenna applications , 2003 .