Are elite journals declining?

Previous research indicates that during the past 20 years, the highest‐quality work has been published in an increasingly diverse and larger group of journals. In this article, we examine whether this diversification has also affected the handful of elite journals that are traditionally considered to be the best. We examine citation patterns during the past 40 years of seven long‐standing traditionally elite journals and six journals that have been increasing in importance during the past 20 years. To be among the top 5% or 1% cited papers, papers now need about twice as many citations as they did 40 years ago. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, elite journals have been publishing a decreasing proportion of these top‐cited papers. This also applies to the two journals that are typically considered as the top venues and often used as bibliometric indicators of “excellence”: Science and Nature. On the other hand, several new and established journals are publishing an increasing proportion of the most‐cited papers. These changes bring new challenges and opportunities for all parties. Journals can enact policies to increase or maintain their relative position in the journal hierarchy. Researchers now have the option to publish in more diverse venues knowing that their work can still reach the same audiences. Finally, evaluators and administrators need to know that although there will always be a certain prestige associated with publishing in “elite” journals, journal hierarchies are in constant flux.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The geographical deconcentration of scientific activities (1987-2007) , 2012 .

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system , 2009, Scientometrics.

[4]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  E. Garfield Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  E. Garfield Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? , 1996 .

[7]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Modeling a century of citation distributions , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[12]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Nimish Vakil The Journal Impact Factor: Judging a Book by Its Cover , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[14]  Morten Lauge Pedersen,et al.  Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) , 2005 .

[15]  P. Zhou,et al.  The Emergence of China as a Leading Nation in Science. Research Policy, 35(1), 2006, 83-104. , 2006, 0911.3421.

[16]  R. Spier The history of the peer-review process. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[18]  H. Moed Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[19]  R. Rousseau,et al.  BIBLIOMETRICS AND INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION , 2001 .

[20]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research , 2010, PloS one.

[21]  Joseph E. Harmon,et al.  The Scientific Literature: A Guided Tour , 2007 .

[22]  H. Deda,et al.  Communication in science. , 2002, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.