What is science?: preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science

Science for All Americans declares that an understanding of the nature of science is one criterion of scientific literacy. Unfortunately practising science teachers often misunderstand and misrepresent the nature of their disciplines. In this study we have attempted to construct an understanding of preservice elementary teachers' views by analysing their written responses to questions about the nature of science. We used analytic induction to derive categories and themes from the data and then formulated generalizations from these themes. Our findings reveal that out students have realist and positivist views of the scientific enterprise, and that they place little emphasis on the social or creative dimensions of the discipline. These preservice teachers will soon offer young children their first experiences with school science; their beliefs about the nature of science have implications for their science teaching and for their students' science learning.

[1]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[2]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum , 1988 .

[3]  M. Bentley,et al.  The role of philosophy of science in science teacher education , 1991 .

[4]  D. Lortie.  Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[5]  Cathleen C. Loving.  The Scientific Theory Profile: A Philosophy of Science Model for Science Teachers. , 1991 .

[6]  Pamela J. Schram.  Changing Mathematical Conceptions of Preservice Teachers: A Content and Pedagogical Intervention. , 1988 .

[7]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science: A Reassessment , 1986 .

[8]  Jeffrey W. Bloom.  Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of science: science, theories and evolution* , 1989 .

[9]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[10]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Philosophy of science: an empirical study of teachers’ views , 1989 .

[11]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice , 1990 .

[12]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The Effect of Teachers' Language on Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science. , 1989 .

[13]  Analyzing science lessons: A case study with gifted children , 1989 .

[14]  Teachers' and Teacher Candidates' Beliefs about Subject Matter and about Teaching Responsibilities. , 1990 .

[15]  E. Glasersfeld.  An Introduction to Radical Constructivism , 1981 .

[16]  M. Linn,et al.  How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? , 1991 .

[17]  Folajimi Akindehin.  Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science‐related attitudes , 1988 .

[18]  Bruce B. King.  Beginning teachers' knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science , 1991 .

[19]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[20]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .

[21]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[22]  William F. Bynum,et al.  Dictionary of the History of Science , 2014 .

[23]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? , 1987 .

[24]  R. Driver,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science , 1986 .

[25]  Victor Y. Billeh,et al.  Factors Affecting Teachers' Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science. , 1975 .

[26]  C. Linder,et al.  Student-Teachers' Conceptions of Science, Teaching and Learning : A Case Study in Preservice Science Education , 1990 .

[27]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Peering at History through Different Lenses: The Role of Disciplinary Perspectives in Teaching History , 1988, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[28]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education , 1988 .

[29]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[30]  Classroom and community influences on youths' perceptions of science in a rural county school system , 1991 .

[31]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .