Reliability analysis with consideration of asymmetrically dependent variables: Discussion and application to geotechnical examples

Abstract The consideration of multivariate models in the reliability analysis is quite essential from practical perspective. In principle, complete information regarding the joint probability distribution function should be known in prior to the analysis. However, in real practice, only the marginal distribution and covariance matrix are known in most cases. Such incomplete probabilistic information could lead to dubious results if dependences are not fully catered. Asymmetric dependence is one of these factors influencing the quality of reliability analysis. In this paper, the influences of asymmetric dependences to the reliability problem are investigated. The copula theory as well as the concept of asymmetric dependences is briefly introduced. The techniques of constructing asymmetric copulas are, thereafter, provided in details. Geotechnical problem is selected in this study as examples in the reliability analysis. Based on the given information, a group of symmetric and asymmetric copulas are selected to model the dependences between cohesion and friction angle, the parameters more commonly used to characterize soil strength. The reliability analysis of a continuous spread footing and an infinite slope are then presented to demonstrate the influence of asymmetric dependences on reliability. The results showed that the failure probabilities of the investigated geotechnical problems are very sensitive to the adopted dependence structure, either symmetrically or asymmetrically. The commonly applied one parameter symmetric copulas, such as Archimedean copulas, may underestimate the failure probabilities. Furthermore, the asymmetric copulas are more powerful in characterizing the tail dependences structures of variables especially for asymmetric dependent variables.

[1]  H. Joe Dependence Modeling with Copulas , 2014 .

[2]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Characterization of geotechnical variability – a multivariate perspective , 2014 .

[3]  Xing Zheng Wu Trivariate analysis of soil ranking-correlated characteristics and its application to probabilistic stability assessments in geotechnical engineering problems , 2013 .

[4]  Fan Wang,et al.  System reliability under prescribed marginals and correlations: Are we correct about the effect of correlations? , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Copula Modeling: An Introduction for Practitioners , 2007 .

[6]  P. Robertson Interpretation of cone penetration tests — a unified approach , 2009 .

[7]  ChingJianye,et al.  Modeling parameters of structured clays as a multivariate normal distribution , 2012 .

[8]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Long-term performance assessment and design of offshore structures , 2015 .

[9]  Christian Genest,et al.  Assessing and Modeling Asymmetry in Bivariate Continuous Data , 2013 .

[10]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Correlations for undrained shear strength of Finnish soft clays , 2016 .

[11]  Stéphane Girard,et al.  A class of multivariate copulas based on products of bivariate copulas , 2015, J. Multivar. Anal..

[12]  C. Genest,et al.  Statistical Inference Procedures for Bivariate Archimedean Copulas , 1993 .

[13]  A. Cardoso,et al.  Natural Variability of Shear Strength in a Granite Residual Soil from Porto , 2014 .

[14]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  Failure-mode importance measures in structural system with multiple failure modes and its estimation using copula , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Modeling multivariate ocean data using asymmetric copulas , 2018 .

[16]  Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.  Reliability analysis with scarce information: Comparing alternative approaches in a geotechnical engineering context , 2013 .

[17]  Eckhard Liebscher,et al.  Construction of asymmetric multivariate copulas , 2008 .

[18]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Bivariate distribution of shear strength parameters using copulas and its impact on geotechnical system reliability , 2015 .

[19]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Reliability assessment of aging structures subjected to gradual and shock deteriorations , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Francesco Serinaldi,et al.  Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis , 2006 .

[21]  M. Sklar Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[22]  R. Nelsen An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .

[23]  K. Phoon,et al.  Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information , 2015 .

[24]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  New families of symmetric/asymmetric copulas , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[25]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  How non-symmetric can a copula be? , 2006 .

[26]  ChingJianye,et al.  Modeling piezocone cone penetration (CPTU) parameters of clays as a multivariate normal distribution , 2014 .

[27]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  A Copula Approach in the Point Estimate Method for Reliability Engineering , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[28]  Bond Andrew,et al.  Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design. Worked examples , 2013 .

[29]  Andrew J. Patton,et al.  Copulas in Econometrics , 2014 .

[30]  K. K. Choi,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula , 2009 .

[31]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Investigating dependencies among oil price and tanker market variables by copula-based multivariate models , 2018, Energy.

[32]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of correlated non-normal geotechnical parameters using Gaussian copula , 2012, Science China Technological Sciences.

[33]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[34]  Christian Genest,et al.  Multivariate Archimax copulas , 2014, J. Multivar. Anal..

[35]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Continuous Bivariate Distributions, Emphasising Applications , 1991 .

[36]  ChingJianye,et al.  Correlations among some clay parameters — the multivariate distribution , 2014 .

[37]  C. De Michele,et al.  On the Use of Copulas in Hydrology: Theory and Practice , 2007 .