Discrimination of short time intervals by the human observer

Abstract For time intervals in the 150–1500 ms range, the difference-discrimination thresholds are about 5%. The value of this Weber fraction varies somewhat depending whether the stimulus modality is vision, hearing or touch. Thresholds are higher when a time interval signaled in one modality has to be compared with one in another, and also when two different modalities are used to delineate a single time interval, as well as when onset and offset are in the same modality but signaled to opposite cortical hemispheres. There is a prominent practice effect. This effect was used to show that there is complete transfer of training between the two visual hemispheres. These findings imply that the time-discrimination mechanism is not located at an early stage of visual processing. If there is a single central time-discrimination apparatus, the observed intermodal differences must relate to the relative ease of access to it via different modalities. The mechanism involved needs elucidating. Counting of spikes or internal time modules would seem to be too simplistic a concept; there is still a need for a process in which the duration of a just concluded presentation and an internally stored interval duration can be compared.

[1]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  Discrimination of time intervals marked by brief acoustic pulses of various intensities and spectra , 1977 .

[2]  D. Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in parafoveal vision , 1995, Vision Research.

[3]  Nancy Byl,et al.  Practice-Related Improvements in Somatosensory Interval Discrimination Are Temporally Specific But Generalize across Skin Location, Hemisphere, and Modality , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Grondin,et al.  Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  D. Purves,et al.  The wagon wheel illusion in movies and reality. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R B Ivry,et al.  Markers’ influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  L. D. Goodfellow,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Audition, Vision, and Touch in the Discrimination of Short Intervals of Time , 1934 .

[8]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Temporal information transformed into a spatial code by a neural network with realistic properties , 1995, Science.

[9]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatial localization: specificity for orientation, position, and context. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Robert Rousseau,et al.  Duration discrimination of empty time intervals marked by intermodal pulses , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  Alfred B. Kristofferson,et al.  Psychophysical theories of duration discrimination , 1974 .

[15]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Perception of temporal order in adjacent visual stimuli , 1977, Vision Research.