How Does Attention Relate to the Ability-Specific and Position-Specific Components of Reasoning Measured by APM?.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Raven. Advanced progressive matrices : sets I and II , 1962 .
[2] Stephen J. Boies,et al. Components of attention. , 1971 .
[3] Lee W. Gregg,et al. Knowledge and cognition , 1974 .
[4] R. Davidson,et al. Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .
[5] R. Shiffrin,et al. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .
[6] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .
[7] Walter Schneider,et al. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .
[8] Willis F. Overton,et al. Advances in research and theory , 1977 .
[9] P. McCullagh,et al. Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .
[10] Donald A. Norman,et al. Attention to Action , 1986 .
[11] J. Kihlstrom. The cognitive unconscious. , 1987, Science.
[12] E. S. Knowles,et al. Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. , 1988 .
[13] P. McCullagh,et al. Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .
[14] James C. Hamilton,et al. Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability , 1990 .
[15] M A Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .
[16] P. F. Jong,et al. The Star Counting Test: An attention test for children. , 1990 .
[17] Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .
[18] A. Formann,et al. Psychometric shortcomings of Raven's standard progressive matrices, in particular for computerized testing , 1991 .
[19] Tom W. Smith. Thoughts on the Nature of Context Effects , 1992 .
[20] N. Schwarz,et al. Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research , 1992 .
[21] A. Ohman,et al. "Unconscious anxiety": phobic responses to masked stimuli. , 1994, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[22] P. F. Jong,et al. Attention and Intelligence: The Validity of the Star Counting Test. , 1995 .
[23] Odmar Neumann,et al. Chapter 10 Theories of attention , 1996 .
[24] Odmar Neumann. Theories of attention. , 1996 .
[25] Eric S. Knowles,et al. Reliability shifts in measurement reactivity: driven by content engagement or self-engagement? , 1996 .
[26] R. Hambleton,et al. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory , 1997 .
[27] A. Jensen,et al. The g factor , 1996, Nature.
[28] N. Cowan. An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .
[29] A. Miyake,et al. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .
[30] J. Jonides,et al. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.
[31] Randall W Engle,et al. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[32] Lazar Stankov,et al. Complexity, Metacognition, and Fluid Intelligence , 2000 .
[33] Tom Verguts,et al. A Rasch Model for Detecting Learning While Solving an Intelligence Test , 2000 .
[34] R. Engle,et al. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[35] R. Engle. Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .
[36] K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .
[37] Helfried Moosbrugger,et al. Attention and Working Memory as Predictors of Intelligence. , 2004 .
[38] Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al. Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g , 2004 .
[39] P. Ackerman,et al. Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .
[40] J. Sweller,et al. Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .
[41] Frank Goldhammer,et al. Latent Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Attention Measures Perceptual and Executive Attention , 2006 .
[42] The Fixed-Links Model in Combination With the Polynomial Function as a Tool for Investigating Choice Reaction Time Data , 2006 .
[43] Johannes Hartig,et al. A Confirmatory Analysis of Item Reliability Trends (CAIRT): Differentiating True Score and Error Variance in the Analysis of Item Context Effects , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.
[45] K. Kubinger. On the revival of the Rasch model-based LLTM: From constructing tests using item generating rules to measuring item administration effects , 2008 .
[46] Andreas Gold,et al. The confirmatory investigation of APM items with loadings as a function of the position and easiness of items: A two-dimensional model of APM , 2009 .
[47] Cognitive load theory , 2009 .
[48] W. Johnson,et al. Group differences in the heritability of items and test scores , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[49] K. Schweizer. The Relationship of Attention and Intelligence , 2010 .
[50] Gerald Matthews,et al. Handbook of individual differences in cognition : attention, memory, and executive control , 2010 .
[51] S. Troche,et al. On the special relationship between fluid and general intelligence: New evidence obtained by considering the position effect , 2011 .