Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data

We propose a method for the statistical analysis of fMRI data that tests cluster units rather than voxel units for activation. The advantages of this analysis over previous ones are both conceptual and statistical. Recognizing that the fundamental units of interest are the spatially contiguous clusters of voxels that are activated together, we set out to approximate these cluster units from the data by a clustering algorithm especially tailored for fMRI data. Testing the cluster units has a two-fold statistical advantage over testing each voxel separately: the signal to noise ratio within the unit tested is higher, and the number of hypotheses tests compared is smaller. We suggest controlling FDR on clusters, i.e., the proportion of clusters rejected erroneously out of all clusters rejected and explain the meaning of controlling this error rate. We introduce the powerful adaptive procedure to control the FDR on clusters. We apply our cluster-based analysis (CBA) to both an event-related and a block design fMRI vision experiment and demonstrate its increased power over voxel-by-voxel analysis in these examples as well as in simulations.

[1]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Fuzzy cluster analysis of high-field functional MRI data , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[3]  John D. Storey.  The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value , 2003 .

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[7]  N. Rubin,et al.  fMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2003, Neuron.

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  John D. Storey,et al.  Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach , 2004 .

[11]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Mixtures of general linear models for functional neuroimaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Efficient Design of Event-Related fMRI Experiments Using M-Sequences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[15]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[16]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Multiple Hypotheses Testing with Weights , 1997 .

[17]  I. Verdinelli,et al.  False Discovery Control for Random Fields , 2004 .

[18]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .