Seeing ahead: Experience and language in spatial perspective

Spatial perspective can be directed by various reference frames, as well as by the direction of motion. In the present study, we explored how ambiguity in spatial tasks can be resolved. Participants were presented with virtual reality environments in order to stimulate a spatial reference frame based on motion. They interacted with an ego-moving spatial system in Experiment 1 and an object-moving spatial system in Experiment 2. While interacting with the virtual environment, the participants were presented with either a question representing a motion system different from that of the virtual environment or a nonspatial question relating to physical features of the virtual environment. They then performed the target task: assign the label front in an ambiguous spatial task. The findings indicate that the disambiguation of spatial terms can be influenced by embodied experiences, as represented by the virtual environment, as well as by linguistic context.

[1]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Active navigation and orientation-free spatial representations , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[2]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  N. Gale,et al.  Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition , 1987 .

[4]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. Loomis,et al.  Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  The Role of Front-Back Features in Children's "Front,""Back," and "Beside" Placements of Objects. , 1970 .

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[11]  M. McGlone,et al.  Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. , 1998 .

[12]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[14]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction , 1997 .

[15]  S. Levinson Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[16]  C. Fillmore Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis , 1982 .

[17]  G. Lakoff Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[18]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[19]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system-mappings in understanding space-time metaphors , 2003 .