Noise Levels in Hong Kong Primary Schools: Implications for classroom listening

Many researchers have stressed that the acoustic environment is crucial to the speech perception, academic performance, attention, and participation of students in classrooms. Classrooms in highly urbanised locations are especially vulnerable to noise, a major influence on the acoustic environment. The purpose of this investigation was to determine noise levels in one such urban environment, Hong Kong. The ambient noise level, and its relationship to the speech intensity levels of both teachers and students was surveyed in 47 primary school classrooms. Moreover, the presence of acoustical treatments for noise reduction and the use of classroom amplification systems were documented for each classroom. The survey found that the mean occupied noise level was 60.74 dB (A); the mean unamplified and amplified speech‐to‐noise ratios of teachers were 13.53 dB and 18.45 dB, respectively; while the mean unamplified speech‐to‐noise ratio for students was 4.13 dB. Most of the classrooms exhibited insufficient acoustical treatments to provide significant noise reduction. The listening environment in many Hong Kong primary schools was not favourable for optimal classroom learning. Recommendations for improving the acoustical environment in classrooms in highly urbanised locations such as Hong Kong are discussed.

[1]  Linda Allen,et al.  Improving Classroom Acoustics (ICA): A Three-Year FM Sound Field Classroom Amplification Study. , 1999 .

[2]  Y. Sininger Establishing Clinical Norms for Auditory Brainstem Response. , 1992, American journal of audiology.

[3]  Guidelines for Addressing Acoustics in Educational Settings ASHA Working Group on Classroom Acoustics , 2004 .

[4]  C. Crandell,et al.  Classroom Acoustics for Children With Normal Hearing and With Hearing Impairment. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[5]  Heather A. Knecht,et al.  Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. , 2002, American journal of audiology.

[6]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Carl C. Crandell,et al.  Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics , 2004 .

[8]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Effects of sound-field frequency modulation amplification on reducing teachers' sound pressure level in the classroom. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[9]  Frederick S. Berg Acoustics and Sound Systems in Schools , 1993 .

[10]  A Markides,et al.  Speech levels and speech-to-noise ratios. , 1986, British journal of audiology.

[11]  C. Crandell,et al.  Classroom Amplification Technology: Theory and Practice. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[12]  Lois Thibault,et al.  Implementation of ANSI S12.60 acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools , 2001 .

[13]  S. Gray,et al.  Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[14]  Arthur Boothroyd,et al.  Room Acoustics and Speech Perception , 2004 .

[15]  Bradley McPherson,et al.  The effects of sound field classroom amplification on the cummunicative interactions of aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children , 1999 .

[16]  M. Ermann,et al.  Ten Ways to Provide a High-Quality Acoustical Environment in Schools. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[17]  C. Flexer,et al.  Sound-Field Amplification , 2003 .

[18]  Hai Leong Toh Hong Kong 2002 , 2003 .

[19]  S. Soli,et al.  Acoustical Barriers to Learning: Children at Risk in Every Classroom. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[20]  Frederick S. Berg,et al.  Classroom Acoustics: The Problem, Impact, and Solution. , 1996 .