Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundThis study aimed to quantify the variation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation between CT, MR and FDG PET-CT imaging.MethodsA prospective, single centre, pilot study was undertaken where 11 patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers (2 tonsil, 9 base of tongue primaries) underwent pre-treatment, contrast enhanced, FDG PET-CT and MR imaging, all performed in a radiotherapy treatment mask. CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs were contoured by 5 clinicians (2 radiologists and 3 radiation oncologists). A semi-automated segmentation algorithm was used to contour PET GTVs. Volume and positional analyses were undertaken, accounting for inter-observer variation, using linear mixed effects models and contour comparison metrics respectively.ResultsSignificant differences in mean GTV volume were found between CT (11.9 cm3) and CT-MR (14.1 cm3), p < 0.006, CT-MR and PET (9.5 cm3), p < 0.0009, and MR (12.7 cm3) and PET, p < 0.016. Substantial differences in GTV position were found between all modalities with the exception of CT-MR and MR GTVs. A mean of 64 %, 74 % and 77 % of the PET GTVs were included within the CT, MR and CT-MR GTVs respectively. A mean of 57 % of the MR GTVs were included within the CT GTV; conversely a mean of 63 % of the CT GTVs were included within the MR GTV. CT inter-observer variability was found to be significantly higher in terms of position and/or volume than both MR and CT-MR (p < 0.05). Significant differences in GTV volume were found between GTV volumes delineated by radiologists (9.7 cm3) and oncologists (14.6 cm3) for all modalities (p = 0.001).ConclusionsThe use of different imaging modalities produced significantly different GTVs, with no single imaging technique encompassing all potential GTV regions. The use of MR reduced inter-observer variability. These data suggest delineation based on multimodality imaging has the potential to improve accuracy of GTV definition.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN34165059. Registered 2nd February 2015.

[1]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Comparative Study With New Accuracy Metrics for Target Volume Contouring in PET Image Guided Radiation Therapy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  A. Riegel,et al.  Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[4]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology , 2012, EJNMMI Research.

[5]  B. Carey,et al.  Improving target definition for head and neck radiotherapy: a place for magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fluoride fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography? , 2012, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[6]  C. Terhaard,et al.  Origin of tumor recurrence after intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Jonathan G. Li,et al.  Patterns of failure and toxicity after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Lee,et al.  Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  A. Eisbruch,et al.  Delineating neck targets for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer. , 2011, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[10]  Cornelis A T van den Berg,et al.  Validation of imaging with pathology in laryngeal cancer: accuracy of the registration methodology. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Shirlaw THE METABOLISM OF TUMOURS , 1931 .

[12]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  Suzanne L Wolden,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: an update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Andrea Schaefer,et al.  A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Johan Bussink,et al.  Innovations in Radiotherapy Planning of Head and Neck Cancers: Role of PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  D. S. Moore,et al.  The Basic Practice of Statistics , 2001 .

[17]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Functional image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy: integration of the tumour microenvironment in treatment planning. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Alicia Y Toledano,et al.  An evaluation of the variability of tumor-shape definition derived by experienced observers from CT images of supraglottic carcinomas (ACRIN protocol 6658). , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  A. Garden,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Head and Neck Cancer Patterns of Disease Recurrence Following Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2013 .

[20]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[21]  N G Burnet,et al.  A novel algorithm for the morphometric assessment of radiotherapy treatment planning volumes. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  D. Farina,et al.  Tumours of the oropharynx and oral cavity: perineural spread and bone invasion. , 1999, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[23]  Priya Bhatnagar,et al.  Functional imaging for radiation treatment planning, response assessment, and adaptive therapy in head and neck cancer. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  L. Dawson,et al.  Recurrences near base of skull after IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: implications for target delineation in high neck and for parotid gland sparing. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Christine Kong,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging in target volume delineation of base of tongue tumours--a study using flexible surface coils. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[27]  N. Lee,et al.  Target volume delineation in oropharyngeal cancer: impact of PET, MRI, and physical examination. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  E. Boyland Metabolism of Tumours , 1940, Nature.

[29]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Comparative study with new accuracy metrics for target volume contouring in PET image guided radiation therapy. , 2012, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[30]  C. Njeh,et al.  Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy , 2008, Journal of medical physics.

[31]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Impact of [18F]FDG PET imaging parameters on automatic tumour delineation: need for improved tumour delineation methodology , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  S. Korreman,et al.  Recurrences after intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma more likely to originate from regions with high baseline [18F]-FDG uptake. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  I. Buvat,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.