Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses.

In binocular rivalry, a subject views two incongruent stimuli through each eye but consciously perceives only one stimulus at a time, with a switch in perceptual dominance every few seconds. To investigate the neural correlates of perceptual dominance in humans, seven subjects were recorded with a 148-channel magnetoencephalography array while experiencing binocular rivalry. A red vertical grating flickering at one frequency was presented to one eye through a red filter and a blue horizontal grating flickering at a different frequency was presented to the other eye through a blue filter. Steady-state neuromagnetic responses at the two frequencies were used as tags for the two stimuli and analyzed with high-resolution power spectra. It was found that a large number of channels showed peaks at both frequencies, arranged in a horseshoe pattern from posterior to anterior regions, whether or not the subject was consciously perceiving the corresponding stimulus. However, the amount of power at the stimulus frequency was modulated in relation to perceptual dominance, being lower in many channels by 50-85% when the subject was not conscious of that stimulus. Such modulation by perceptual dominance, although not global, was distributed to a large subset of regions showing stimulus-related responses, including regions outside visual cortex. The results demonstrate a correlation between the conscious perception of a visual stimulus and the synchronous activity of large populations of neurons as reflected by steady-state neuromagnetic responses.

[1]  R. Lansing Electroencephalographic Correlates of Binocular Rivalry in Man , 1964, Science.

[2]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[3]  D. Mackay Evoked Potentials reflecting Interocular and Monocular Suppression , 1968, Nature.

[4]  W. R. Biersdorf,et al.  Binocular rivalry and visual evoked responses. , 1968, Investigative ophthalmology.

[5]  B. Julesz,et al.  Evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms in monkey and man: A test for cyclopean perception , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  Suppression and the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1986, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[7]  D. Regan,et al.  Human brain electrophysiology , 1989 .

[8]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Foundations of Cognitive Science , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Edelman,et al.  Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  S. Petersen,et al.  The pulvinar and visual salience , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[12]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC , 1993 .

[13]  W. J. Nowack Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995, Neurology.

[14]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[15]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[16]  G. Edelman,et al.  Neural dynamics in a model of the thalamocortical system. II. The role of neural synchrony tested through perturbations of spike timing. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  W. Singer,et al.  Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Norcia,et al.  A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.