Quantitative assessment of the stent/scaffold strut embedment analysis by optical coherence tomography

The degree of stent/scaffold embedment could be a surrogate parameter of the vessel wall-stent/scaffold interaction and could have biological implications in the vascular response. We have developed a new specific software for the quantitative evaluation of embedment of struts by optical coherence tomography (OCT). In the present study, we described the algorithm of the embedment analysis and its reproducibility. The degree of embedment was evaluated as the ratio of the embedded part versus the whole strut height and subdivided into quartiles. The agreement and the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were evaluated using the kappa and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A total of 4 pullbacks of OCT images in 4 randomly selected coronary lesions with 3.0 × 18 mm devices [2 lesions with Absorb BVS and 2 lesions with XIENCE (both from Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA)] from Absorb Japan trial were evaluated by two investigators with QCU-CMS software version 4.69 (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands). Finally, 1481 polymeric struts in 174 cross-sections and 1415 metallic struts in 161 cross-sections were analyzed. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of quantitative measurements of embedment ratio and categorical assessment of embedment in Absorb BVS and XIENCE had excellent agreement with ICC ranging from 0.958 to 0.999 and kappa ranging from 0.850 to 0.980. The newly developed embedment software showed excellent reproducibility. Computer-assisted embedment analysis could be a feasible tool to assess the strut penetration into the vessel wall that could be a surrogate of acute injury caused by implantation of devices.

[1]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular optical coherence tomographic pullback runs , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  W. Cheong,et al.  A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan. , 2015, European heart journal.

[4]  R. Virmani,et al.  Preclinical restenosis models and drug-eluting stents: still important, still much to learn. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  Y. Jang,et al.  The relationship between post-stent strut apposition and follow-up strut coverage assessed by a contour plot optical coherence tomography analysis. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  J. Gunn,et al.  Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima , 2002, Heart.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Snowshoe Versus Ice Skate for Scaffolding of Disrupted Vessel Wall. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Colombo,et al.  Impact of Strut Width in Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Bioresorbable Scaffolds and the First-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Jeroen Eggermont,et al.  Automatic detection of bioresorbable vascular scaffold struts in intravascular optical coherence tomography pullback runs. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[12]  A. Rollins,et al.  Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review clinical and research applications. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  E. Edelman,et al.  Vascular bed origin dictates flow pattern regulation of endothelial adhesion molecule expression. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Effect of the endothelial shear stress patterns on neointimal proliferation following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. , 2014, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

[15]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[16]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[18]  J. Ormiston,et al.  An independent bench comparison of two bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds (Absorb and DESolve) with a durable metallic drug-eluting stent (ML8/Xpedition). , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  Francesco Prati,et al.  From bench to bedside: a novel technique of acquiring OCT images. , 2008, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[20]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  In vivo assessment of the three-dimensional haemodynamic micro-environment following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in a human coronary artery: fusion of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and angiography. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[22]  Yiannis S. Chatzizisis,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  P. Davies,et al.  Hemodynamically Driven Stent Strut Design , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  T. Kawamoto,et al.  The relationship between coronary plaque characteristics and small embolic particles during coronary stent implantation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Rosaire Mongrain,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of stent strut profile on shear stress distribution using statistical moments , 2009, Biomedical engineering online.