Template-based Geometric Transformations of a Functionally Enriched DMU into FE Assembly Models

Pre-processing of CAD models derived from Digital Mock-Ups (DMUs) into finite element (FE) models is usually completed after many tedious tasks of model preparation and shape transformations. It is highly valuable for simulation engineers to automate time-consuming sequences of assembly preparation processes. Here, it is proposed to use an enriched DMU with geometric interfaces between components (contacts and interferences) and functional properties. Then, the key concept of template-based transformation can connect to assembly functions to locate consistent sets of components in the DMU. Subsequently, sets of shape transformations feed the template content to adapt components to FE requirements. To precisely monitor the friction areas and the mesh around bolts, the template creates sub-domains into their tightened components and preserves the consistency of geometric interfaces for the mesh generation purposes. From a user-selected assembly function, the method is able to robustly identify, locate and transform groups of components while preserving the consistency of the assembly needed for FE models. To enlarge the scope of the template in the assembly function taxonomy, it is shown how the concept of dependent function enforces the geometric and functional consistency of the transformed assembly. To demonstrate the proposed approach, a business oriented prototype processes bolted junctions of aeronautical structures.

[1]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  A survey of CAD model simplification techniques for physics-based simulation applications , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Corey Ernst,et al.  Conformal Assembly Meshing with Tolerant Imprinting , 2008, IMR.

[3]  Vadim Shapiro,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Solid and physical modeling , 2005 .

[4]  Mincheol Kim,et al.  An integrated approach to realize multi-resolution of B-rep model , 2005, SPM '05.

[5]  Albert Albers,et al.  Contact and Channel Model for Pairs of Working Surfaces , 2006 .

[6]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Automated Assembly Model Simplification for Finite Element Analysis , 2012 .

[7]  Sebti Foufou,et al.  OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Assembly Feature Tutor and Recognition Algorithms Based on Mating Face Pairs , 2010 .

[9]  Carlos Andújar,et al.  Topology-reducing surface simplification using a discrete solid representation , 2002, TOGS.

[10]  H. Saunders,et al.  An Introduction to the Design and Behaviour of Bolted Joints , 1983 .

[11]  Alexei Mikchevitch,et al.  Merging enriched Finite Element triangle meshes for fast prototyping of alternate solutions in the context of industrial maintenance , 2010, Comput. Aided Des..

[12]  Willem F. Bronsvoort,et al.  Assembly features in modeling and planning , 2000 .

[13]  Utpal Roy,et al.  Design with part behaviors: behavior model, representation and applications , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Yan Wang,et al.  Design formalism for collaborative assembly design , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Sudarsan Rachuri,et al.  An ontology for assembly representation , 2007 .

[16]  Gianfranco La Rocca,et al.  Knowledge based engineering: Between AI and CAD. Review of a language based technology to support engineering design , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  Cecil Armstrong,et al.  Integrating CAE concepts with CAD geometry , 2002 .

[18]  Cecil Armstrong,et al.  Automated mixed dimensional modelling from 2D and 3D CAD models , 2011 .

[19]  Kenji Shimada,et al.  A computational framework for automating generation of sizing function in assembly meshing via disconnected skeletons , 2010, Engineering with Computers.

[20]  Re Link,et al.  An Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints , 1991 .

[21]  Olivier Palombi,et al.  Qualitative behavioral reasoning from components' interfaces to components' functions for DMU adaption to FE analyses , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[22]  Albert Albers,et al.  Contact and Channel Modeling to Support Early Design of Technical Systems , 2009 .

[23]  Vincent Thomson,et al.  Ontology based interface design and control methodology for collaborative product development , 2012, Comput. Aided Des..

[24]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function — Behaviour — Structure Framework , 2004 .

[25]  Kyoung-Yun Kim,et al.  Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[26]  Laurent Champaney,et al.  A domain decomposition method for studying the effects of missing fasteners on the behavior of structural assemblies with contact and friction , 2012 .

[27]  Pierre-Alain Boucard,et al.  Adaptive multi-analysis strategy for contact problems with friction , 2008 .

[28]  W. Sander,et al.  Experimental phased array radar ELRA with extended flexibility , 1990 .

[29]  L. Fine,et al.  An analysis of DMU transformation requirements for structural assembly simulations , 2012 .

[30]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge , 2004 .

[31]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[32]  Craig B. Chapman,et al.  Design engineering - a need to rethink the solution using knowledge based engineering , 1999, Knowledge-Based Systems.

[33]  Jean-Claude Léon,et al.  A new approach to the preparation of models for FE analyses , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[34]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[35]  Philippe Véron,et al.  Identifying and re-meshing contact interfaces in a polyhedral assembly for digital mock-up , 2006, Engineering with Computers.