The ‘no problem’ Discourse model: Exploring an alternative way of researching student learning

Abstract In this paper we explore an alternative way of characterising the student learning experience, drawing on sociocultural perspectives on learning. Here, learning is not merely the application of an approach to a cognitive task, but a social process of identity formation. In particular, we draw on Gee's concept of Discourse models to identify the implicit theories students use to make sense of their learning and assessment experiences. From interviews with third year engineering students, we identified what we termed the ‘no problem Discourse model’, in which students construct an upbeat portrayal of their experience of a course, despite experiencing crises induced by assessment events. Through a process of justification the seriousness of the crisis is denied. This Discourse model appears to have its roots in a popular Discourse of self-actualization. There was evidence of co-construction of this model during the student learning interviews. This suggests implications for the roles that teachers can play in either maintaining or challenging the Discourse models that are adopted by students.

[1]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[2]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[3]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning, working and imagining : twelve studies in activity theory , 1990 .

[4]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[5]  Mary Lea,et al.  Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach , 1998 .

[6]  J. Lemke.  Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education , 2001 .

[7]  Tamsin Haggis.  Constructing Images of Ourselves? A Critical Investigation into 'Approaches to Learning' Research in Higher Education , 2003 .

[8]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[9]  G. Webb.  Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography , 1997 .

[10]  J. Malcolm,et al.  Bridging Pedagogic Gaps: Conceptual discontinuities in higher education , 2001 .

[11]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[12]  Graham Webb,et al.  Understanding Staff Development , 1996 .

[13]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[14]  Sarah J. Mann,et al.  Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and engagement , 2001 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[17]  G. Kress.  Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice , 1985 .

[18]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Talk as Data and Practice — a critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience , 1997 .

[19]  James Paul Gee,et al.  话语分析入门 : 理论与方法 = An introduction to discourse analysis : theory and method , 1999 .

[20]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Introduction: Phenomenography in Higher Education , 1997 .