This paper investigates the thermal performance of three RAIA award-winning houses. It compares the occupants’ assessment of the thermal environment with thermal comfort defined in ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-1992. Actual household energy use is compared with AGO figures for standard houses in that location and the house compliance with the recently introduced energy efficiency provisions of the Building Code of Australia is also assessed. The study found that all three houses do not conform to the above Standard and Code. It was predicted that unacceptable amounts of heating and cooling energy would be required to achieve thermal comfort. Despite this, the actual energy consumption of these houses was lower than standard houses in the same regions. The occupants were largely satisfied with the houses’ thermal performance and indicated they had no plans to modify the building or install air-conditioning or other systems to achieve the prescribed thermal comfort. This paper poses some ethical questions to be discussed, and proposes a number of suggestions. Conference theme: Architecture and the environment
[1]
Richard de Dear,et al.
Field experiments on occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot-humid climate
,
1994
.
[2]
Simon Guy,et al.
The Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice
,
2001
.
[3]
Fuller Moore.
Environmental Control Systems: Heating, Cooling, Lighting
,
1992
.
[4]
Refrigerating.
2001 ASHRAE handbook : fundamentals
,
2001
.
[5]
Michael A. Humphreys,et al.
Outdoor temperatures and comfort indoors
,
1978
.
[6]
A Auliciems,et al.
Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception
,
1981,
International journal of biometeorology.
[7]
E. Shove,et al.
Contracting knowledge: the organizational limits to interdisciplinary energy efficiency research and development in the US and the UK
,
1999
.