Distinct Attention Networks for Feature Enhancement and Suppression in Vision

Attention biases sensory processing toward neurons containing information about behaviorally relevant events. These attentional biases apparently reflect the combined influence of feature enhancement and suppression. We examined the separate influence of enhancement and suppression in visual processing by determining whether responses to an unattended flicker were modulated when the flicker features matched target features at the attended location, competed with those features, or were neutral. We found that suppression primarily modulated parietal networks with a preferred frequency in the lower alpha band (f2 = 8 Hz), and enhancement primarily influenced parietal networks with a preferred frequency in the upper alpha band (f2 = 12 Hz). These responses were coupled with perception, with large responses to the unattended flicker leading to subsequently detected targets when the target features matched the flicker features (i.e., during enhancement). Our results suggest that enhancement and suppression are two distinct processes that work together to shape visual perception.

[1]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[3]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional ‘eye’ rivalry and interocular ‘percept’ rivalry , 2009, Brain Research.

[4]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[5]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[7]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  D. Derryberry,et al.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials: Distributed Local Sources and Wave-Like Dynamics Are Sensitive to Flicker Frequency , 2006, Brain Topography.

[12]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[13]  D. Tucker.  Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  W. J. Nowack.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995, Neurology.

[15]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[17]  Jutta Joormann,et al.  Attentional bias in dysphoria: The role of inhibitory processes , 2004 .

[18]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Location- or Feature-Based Targeting of Peripheral Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Javad Salehi Fadardi,et al.  The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  B. Dosher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article NOISE EXCLUSION IN SPATIAL ATTENTION , 2022 .

[26]  John Duncan,et al.  Shape-specific preparatory activity mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  A. Buchner,et al.  Negative Priming as a Memory Phenomenon , 2007 .

[28]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[29]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[30]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[31]  X. Hu,et al.  4 T-fMRI study of nonspatial shifting of selective attention: cerebellar and parietal contributions. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  Alessandro Soranzo,et al.  MLP: A MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation , 2009, Behavior research methods.