Audit Documentation Methods: A Path Model of Cognitive Processing, Memory, and Performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Robert Libby,et al. Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation , 1993 .
[2] David N. Ricchiute. The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions , 1999 .
[3] Christopher P. Agoglia,et al. The Effects of Alternative Justification Memos on the Judgments of Audit Reviewees and Reviewers , 2003 .
[4] H. Tan,et al. Effects of the preparer's justification on the reviewer's hypothesis generation and judgment in analytical procedures , 2000 .
[5] H. Tan,et al. Determinants of Audit Preparers' Workpaper Justifications , 2006 .
[6] Allan Collins,et al. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .
[7] R. Mayer. Aids to text comprehension , 1984 .
[8] Jacqueline S. Hammersley. Pattern Identification and Industry‐Specialist Auditors , 2006 .
[9] S.E.C. Purvis,et al. THE EFFECT OF AUDIT DOCUMENTATION FORMAT ON DATA COLLECTION. , 1989 .
[10] James L. Bierstaker,et al. Presentation format, relevant experience and task performance , 2001 .
[11] E. Pedhazur. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .
[12] Geoffrey B. Sprinkle,et al. The Effects of Audit Risk and Information Importance on Auditor Memory During Working Paper Review , 1997 .
[13] H. Tan,et al. Are Reviewers' Judgements Influenced by Memo Structure and Conclusions Documented in Audit Workpapers?* , 2001 .
[14] Arnold M. Wright,et al. Does the Adoption of a Business Risk Audit Approach Change Internal Control Documentation and Testing Practices , 2004 .
[15] F. Craik,et al. Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .
[16] K. Trotman,et al. Reviewers' Responses to Anticipated Stylization Attempts by Preparers of Audit Workpapers , 2003 .