Mrc1-Dependent Chromatin Compaction Represses DNA Double-Stranded Break Repair by Homologous Recombination Upon Replication Stress

The coordination of DNA replication and repair is critical for the maintenance of genome stability. It has been shown that the Mrc1-mediated S phase checkpoint inhibits DNA double-stranded break (DSB) repair through homologous recombination (HR). How the replication checkpoint inhibits HR remains only partially understood. Here we show that replication stress induces the suppression of both Sgs1/Dna2- and Exo1-mediated resection pathways in an Mrc1-dependent manner. As a result, the loading of the single-stranded DNA binding factor replication protein A (RPA) and Rad51 and DSB repair by HR were severely impaired under replication stress. Notably, the deletion of MRC1 partially restored the recruitment of resection enzymes, DSB end resection, and the loading of RPA and Rad51. The role of Mrc1 in inhibiting DSB end resection is independent of Csm3, Tof1, or Ctf4. Mechanistically, we reveal that replication stress induces global chromatin compaction in a manner partially dependent on Mrc1, and this chromatin compaction limits the access of chromatin remodeling factors and HR proteins, leading to the suppression of HR. Our study reveals a critical role of the Mrc1-dependent chromatin structure change in coordinating DNA replication and recombination under replication stress.

[1]  D. Kong,et al.  Replication fork stalling elicits chromatin compaction for the stability of stalling replication forks , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  S. Mirkin,et al.  Mrc1 and Tof1 prevent fragility and instability at long CAG repeats by their fork stabilizing function , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  A. Malkova,et al.  Break-Induced Replication: The Where, The Why, and The How. , 2018, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[4]  H. Ulrich,et al.  Spatial separation between replisome‐ and template‐induced replication stress signaling , 2018, The EMBO journal.

[5]  Mariko Sasaki,et al.  Ctf4 Prevents Genome Rearrangements by Suppressing DNA Double-Strand Break Formation and Its End Resection at Arrested Replication Forks. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[6]  M. Osley,et al.  The SWI/SNF ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler promotes resection initiation at a DNA double-strand break in yeast , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  D. Branzei,et al.  Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication , 2017, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[8]  M. Giannattasio,et al.  S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion , 2017, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[9]  Philippe Pasero,et al.  Signaling pathways of replication stress in yeast , 2016, FEMS yeast research.

[10]  Arvind Panday,et al.  Yeast HMO1: Linker Histone Reinvented , 2016, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[11]  J. Haber A Life Investigating Pathways That Repair Broken Chromosomes. , 2016, Annual review of genetics.

[12]  T. Hirano,et al.  Condensin-Based Chromosome Organization from Bacteria to Vertebrates , 2016, Cell.

[13]  S. Kowalczykowski An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[14]  H. Neumann,et al.  Author response: Axial contraction and short-range compaction of chromatin synergistically promote mitotic chromosome condensation , 2015 .

[15]  M. Giannattasio,et al.  Rad53-Mediated Regulation of Rrm3 and Pif1 DNA Helicases Contributes to Prevention of Aberrant Fork Transitions under Replication Stress , 2015, Cell reports.

[16]  D. Cortez Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity. , 2015, DNA repair.

[17]  M. Jasin,et al.  Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[18]  Philipp Oberdoerffer Stop relaxing: How DNA damage-induced chromatin compaction may affect epigenetic integrity and disease , 2014, Molecular & cellular oncology.

[19]  M. Wold,et al.  Replication protein A: Single‐stranded DNA's first responder , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[20]  S. Stoynov,et al.  The subunits of the S-phase checkpoint complex Mrc1/Tof1/Csm3: dynamics and interdependence , 2014, Cell Division.

[21]  P. Cejka,et al.  Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks , 2014, Nature.

[22]  M. Sung,et al.  A Macrohistone Variant Links Dynamic Chromatin Compaction to BRCA1-Dependent Genome Maintenance , 2014, Cell reports.

[23]  F. Prado Genetic instability is prevented by Mrc1-dependent spatio-temporal separation of replicative and repair activities of homologous recombination , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  W. Fischle,et al.  A Cascade of Histone Modifications Induces Chromatin Condensation in Mitosis , 2014, Science.

[25]  Ana M. Muñoz-Cabello,et al.  Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[26]  S. Gasser,et al.  Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair. , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[27]  Xuewen Pan,et al.  The Fun30 ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends , 2012, Nature.

[28]  Agnès Thierry,et al.  The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodelers promote DNA end resection , 2012, Nature.

[29]  J. Diffley,et al.  Dpb11 coordinates Mec1 kinase activation with cell cycle-regulated Rad9 recruitment , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[30]  Rohit Prakash,et al.  Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Nature.

[31]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 , 2010, Nature.

[32]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  Csm3, Tof1, and Mrc1 Form a Heterotrimeric Mediator Complex That Associates with DNA Replication Forks , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  K. Shirahige,et al.  The Direct Binding of Mrc1, a Checkpoint Mediator, to Mcm6, a Replication Helicase, Is Essential for the Replication Checkpoint against Methyl Methanesulfonate-Induced Stress , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  P. Pasero,et al.  Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S‐phase checkpoint , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[35]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[36]  J. Haber,et al.  Yeast Mph1 helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implications for crossover control in mitotic recombination. , 2009, Genes & development.

[37]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[38]  Eleni P. Mimitou,et al.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing , 2008, Nature.

[39]  Sang Eun Lee,et al.  Sgs1 Helicase and Two Nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 Resect DNA Double-Strand Break Ends , 2008, Cell.

[40]  D. Lydall,et al.  Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[41]  P. Plevani,et al.  Phosphorylation of the Budding Yeast 9-1-1 Complex Is Required for Dpb11 Function in the Full Activation of the UV-Induced DNA Damage Checkpoint , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[42]  David Lydall,et al.  Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[43]  Marcus B Smolka,et al.  Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Thomas Costelloe,et al.  Docking onto chromatin via the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 Tudor domain , 2007, Yeast.

[45]  Yu Zhang,et al.  RSC Mobilizes Nucleosomes To Improve Accessibility of Repair Machinery to the Damaged Chromatin , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[46]  A. Desai,et al.  An FHA domain–mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  I. Dobbie,et al.  Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. , 2006, DNA repair.

[48]  T. Kelly,et al.  Two-stage mechanism for activation of the DNA replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 in fission yeast. , 2006, Genes & development.

[49]  M. Lopes,et al.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[50]  S. Gasser,et al.  Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. , 2005, Genes & development.

[51]  Robert Wysocki,et al.  Role of Dot1-Dependent Histone H3 Methylation in G1 and S Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Functions of Rad9 , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[52]  P. Pasero,et al.  Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[53]  O. Aparicio,et al.  Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[54]  Masato T. Kanemaki,et al.  Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. , 2005, Genes & development.

[55]  B. Cairns,et al.  Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. , 2005, Genes & development.

[56]  T. Helleday,et al.  Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  M. Lopes,et al.  Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[58]  R. Wysocki,et al.  Role of Dot 1-Dependent Histone H 3 Methylation in G 1 and S Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Functions of Rad 9 , 2005 .

[59]  J. Yates,et al.  Swi1 and Swi3 Are Components of a Replication Fork Protection Complex in Fission Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[60]  R. Rothstein,et al.  Choreography of the DNA Damage Response Spatiotemporal Relationships among Checkpoint and Repair Proteins , 2004, Cell.

[61]  Anna Malkova,et al.  Srs2 and Sgs1–Top3 Suppress Crossovers during Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast , 2003, Cell.

[62]  Katsuhiko Shirahige,et al.  S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex , 2003, Nature.

[63]  S. Gasser,et al.  DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[64]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes , 2003, Science.

[65]  J. Diffley,et al.  A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[66]  Charles Boone,et al.  A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  M. Lopes,et al.  Fork Reversal and ssDNA Accumulation at Stalled Replication Forks Owing to Checkpoint Defects , 2002, Science.

[68]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53 , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[69]  P. Russell,et al.  Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1 , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[70]  J. Diffley,et al.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint , 2001, Nature.