External validation of a prediction model for surgical site infection after thoracolumbar spine surgery in a Western European cohort

BackgroundA prediction model for surgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery was developed in 2014 by Lee et al. This model was developed to compute an individual estimate of the probability of SSI after spine surgery based on the patient’s comorbidity profile and invasiveness of surgery. Before any prediction model can be validly implemented in daily medical practice, it should be externally validated to assess how the prediction model performs in patients sampled independently from the derivation cohort.MethodsWe included 898 consecutive patients who underwent instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery.To quantify overall performance using Nagelkerke’s R2 statistic, the discriminative ability was quantified as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We computed the calibration slope of the calibration plot, to judge prediction accuracy.ResultsSixty patients developed an SSI. The overall performance of the prediction model in our population was poor: Nagelkerke’s R2 was 0.01. The AUC was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.68). The estimated slope of the calibration plot was 0.52.ConclusionsThe previously published prediction model showed poor performance in our academic external validation cohort. To predict SSI after instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery for the present population, a better fitting prediction model should be developed.

[1]  Dean As,et al.  An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in The Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance. , 2000 .

[2]  L. Saiman,et al.  What’s the Evidence? Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies for Surgical Site Infection Following Pediatric Spine Surgery , 2012, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[3]  W. Ding,et al.  Factors predicting surgical site infection after posterior lumbar surgery , 2017, Medicine.

[4]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Risk Factors for the Development of Delayed Infections Following Posterior Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients , 2007, Spine.

[5]  K. Wood,et al.  Management of postoperative instrumented spinal wound infection , 2013, Chinese medical journal.

[6]  Factors predicting surgical site infection after posterior lumbar surgery: A multicenter retrospective study: Retraction , 2017, Medicine.

[7]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[8]  Patrick J Heagerty,et al.  Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation , 2006, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[9]  S. Mirza,et al.  Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  J. Chapman,et al.  Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  Serena S. Hu,et al.  Risk Factors for Infection After Spinal Surgery , 2005, Spine.

[12]  A. Varughese,et al.  Systematic review of risk factors for surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  Kevin R. O'Neill,et al.  Comparative effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of local application of vancomycin powder in posterior spinal fusion for spine trauma: clinical article. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  W R Jarvis,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[16]  J. Limbeek,et al.  Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[17]  M. Rahm,et al.  Postoperative Instrumented Spine Infections: A Retrospective Review , 2010, Southern medical journal.

[18]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  T. Witham,et al.  Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[20]  J. Fairbank,et al.  The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[21]  Shih-Hao Chen,et al.  Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[22]  S. Pirwitz HICPAC guidelines for isolation precautions: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1997, American journal of infection control.

[23]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[24]  N. Agarwal,et al.  Preoperative Predictors of Spinal Infection within the National Surgical Quality Inpatient Database. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[25]  E. Geubbels,et al.  An Operating Surveillance System of Surgical-Site Infections in The Netherlands: Results of the PREZIES National Surveillance Network , 2000, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.